The Maldives relies heavily on a migrant labour force, many of whom are undocumented. Estimates vary widely, from 145,000 to over 230,000 migrant workers present in the country. According to an April 2020 UN report on the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 on the Maldives, the country has the largest proportion of migrant workers in South […]
Maldives: Covid-19 and Detention
The Maldives has more than 100,000 migrant workers—comprising almost 25 percent of the islands’ total population. A large number of these migrants are from Bangladesh, and many are undocumented. With numbers of migrants increasing in recent years, authorities have increasingly cracked down on irregular migration, opening a new dedicated detention centre in Hulhamale (outside Malé) […]
Last updated: March 2009
Maldives Immigration Detention Profile
Located in the Indian Ocean, the Republic of Maldives is an archipelago that includes some 200 inhabited islands. The country has a population of nearly 400,000, more than a quarter of whom live in the capital Malé. The country held its first-ever democratic presidential election in 2008.
According to government authorities, as of 2009 Maldives was home to an estimated 80,000 legal foreign workers and more than 20,000 undocumented workers (Maldives Chronicle 2009). Most of the foreign-born population is comprised of Indians and Bangladeshis (Maldives Chronicle 2008).
The increasing number of foreign-born workers in the country has spurred a government crackdown in recent years. In January 2009, for example, the government issued a deadline for “illegal expatriates” to leave the country within two months or be prosecuted (Maldives Chronicle 2009).
In October 2007, the Department of Immigration and Emigration (DIE) proposed constructing a dedicated migrant detention centre “for the foreigners who violate their stay permit in Maldives especially expatriates. There is a concern for the increasing number of foreign workers who are working illegally in Maldives (DIE 2007).
Detention Policy
The 2007 Immigration Act stipulates rules for the detention and deportation of foreign nationals. According to Section 29 of the act, in cases where a foreign national does not qualify for an entry permit (as per Section 8 of the act), the Controller of Immigration and Emigration has “the power to detain the foreign national at a place where the Controller of Immigration and Emigration deems fit.” In addition, “The owner of the vessel in which the foreign national arrived, shall bear the expenses related to the foreign national’s detention and/or deportation as stipulated in this section.” Section 21 stipulates that in cases of foreign nationals whose permits have been revoked, “This Act does not prevent the Controller of Immigration and Emigration making arrangements for accommodation of a foreign national whom, pursuant to subsection (c), is unable to depart immediately from the Maldives, and is compelled to remain in the Maldives” (Immigration Act 2007).
Detention Infrastructure
As of March 2009, Maldives had one dedicated migrant detention facility, located in the capital. The centre, which is operated by the DIE’s Expatriate Monitoring Centre, has a reported capacity of 50 (HRCM 2009). A 2009 report by the Human Rights Commission of Maldives claimed that many detainees are confined at the facility unconstitutionally because they are held for more than a month without court order (Daily Mirror 2009).
References
- Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 2009. "Sri Lankans Among Detainees Held Unconstitutionally--Maldives HRC.” 9 March 2009.
- Department of Immigration and Emigration (DIE). 2007. Press release. “Proposing of a Detention Center for Foreigners.” 21 October 2007.http://www.immigration.gov.mv/index.php/news/74-proposing-of-a-detention-center-for-foreigners-21st-october-2007.html (accessed10 March 2009).
- Evening News (Maldives). 2009. “Immigration: 338 Foreigners Deported Last Year.” 13 January 2009.
- Human Rights Commission of the Maldives (HRCM). 2009. Press Release. "HRCM Releases Report of Malé Detention Centre." 8 March 2009. (http://www.hrcm.org.mv/news/HRCMReleasesReportonMaleImmigrationDetentionCenter.aspx)
- Maldives Immigration Act. 2007.http://www.immigration.gov.mv/images/info/The_Maldives_Immigration_Act.pdf (accessed 12 March 2009).
- Maldives Chronicle. 2009. “Government Sets Deadline for Illegal Expats to Leave Country.” 30 January 2009.
- Maldives Chronicle. 2008. “Imported Workers Exceed 77,000.” 2 September 2008.
- U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Website. “World Factbook: Maldives.” Last updated 5 March 2009. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mv.html (accessed 12 March 2009).
DETENTION STATISTICS
Migration Detainee Entries
Alternative Total Migration Detainee Entries
Average Daily Detainee Population (year)
DETENTION CAPACITY
ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION
ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT DATA
PRISON DATA
POPULATION DATA
SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA & POLLS
LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Does the Country Have Specific Laws that Provide for Migration-Related Detention?
GROUNDS FOR DETENTION
LENGTH OF DETENTION
DETENTION INSTITUTIONS
Types of Detention Facilities Used in Practice
PROCEDURAL STANDARDS & SAFEGUARDS
COSTS & OUTSOURCING
COVID-19 DATA
TRANSPARENCY
MONITORING
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MONITORING BODIES
NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISMS (OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE)
NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (NGOS)
GOVERNMENTAL MONITORING BODIES
INTERNATIONAL DETENTION MONITORING
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES & TREATY BODIES
International Treaties Ratified
Ratio of relevant international treaties ratified
Relevant Recommendations or Observations Issued by Treaty Bodies
20.The Committee is concerned that migrants, particularly undocumented migrants deemed to be in violation of the Immigration Act, can be held in detention. According to the information received, operations aimed at identifying undocumented migrants, such as Operation Kurangi, have been used to detain or deport migrants without providing them with adequate legal safeguards. The Committee notes with concern reports indicating that migrants are often not presented before a judge to review the legality of their detention and that they do not have access to adequate legal assistance and interpretation services. The Committee is further concerned that decisions regarding their release sometimes depend on negotiations between employers and the immigration authorities, placing migrants at heightened risk of abuse and exploitation (arts. 2 and 5).
21. The Committee recommends that the State party: (f) Collect and regularly publish disaggregated data and statistics on the prosecution and detention of non-citizens, including migrant workers.
37. The Committee is concerned about the absence of an asylum system and the lack of protection mechanisms for refugees. The Committee is also concerned about the lack of an effective procedure to ensure the respect of the principle of non-refoulement (arts. 7, 9, 12,13 and 24).
(b) Ensure respect for the right to seek asylum by enabling effective access to its territory and fully complying with the principle of non-refoulement, which is also guaranteed under section 42 of the Anti-Torture Act;
d) Ensure that all migrants, asylum-seekers and unaccompanied minors have access to free legal aid and adequate interpretation services from the outset of proceedings.
> UN Special Procedures
Visits by Special Procedures of the UN Human Rights Council
Relevant Recommendations or Observations by UN Special Procedures
Immigration Act of 2007 are, in practice, unable to challenge the legality of their
detention before a judge and no legal or interpretation assistance is provided, contrary
to article 9 (4) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Moreover,
there is no asylum adjudication, nor any national refugee protection mechanisms,
contrary to the right to seek asylum under article 14 (1) of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
113. The Working Group urges the Government to bring its immigration regime into
compliance with international standards, ensuring that detention in the migration
context is exceptional, based on an individualized assessment of the need for detention,
subject to judicial review, and for the shortest period of time, in compliance with article
9 (4) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
a cell. Most of the migrants detained there were awaiting the implementation of a deportation
order by the Controller of Immigration. On average, migrants were confined in that facility
for three to six months, however one migrant had been detained for almost two years. Most
residents there complained of the lack of access to telephone calls to their family and the
absence of lawyers to help them defend their claims.
> UN Universal Periodic Review
Relevant Recommendations or Observations from the UN Universal Periodic Review
REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS
HEALTH CARE PROVISION
HEALTH IMPACTS
COVID-19
Country Updates
Government Agencies
Department of Emigration and Immigration, https://www.immigration.gov.mv/
Human Rights Commission of the Maldives, https://hrcm.org.mv/en
International Organisations
International Labour Organization: Office in Sri Lanka, https://www.ilo.org/regions-and-countries/asia-and-pacific/sri-lanka
UNHCR Maldives Country Information, https://www.unhcr.org/where-we-work/countries/maldives
NGO & Research Institutions
Asia Human Rights Commission, http://www.humanrights.asia/
Asia Pacific Forum, https://www.asiapacificforum.net/
