Hong Kong (China)

Detains migrants or asylum seekers?

Yes

Has laws regulating migration-related detention?

Yes

Migration Detainee Entries

5,549

2022

Detained Women

2,696

2022

Refugees

260

2024

Asylum Applications

1,257

2022

Overview

Hong Kong has long played a critical role in addressing migration and refugee challenges in Southeast Asia, dating back to the 1970s when it served as a primary destination for thousands of Vietnamese “boat people.” Since China assumed control of the Hong Kong “Special Administrative Region” in 1997, its immigration policies have been shaped by often competing trends, including a need for migrant labour and tensions over increasing migration flows from mainland China and neighbouring countries in Southeast Asia. Although the use of immigration detention has remained comparably low since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, detention remains a key immigration enforcement measure even as many of Hong Kong’s detention centres have been criticised for their poor conditions and complaints of mistreatment.

Types of facilities used for migration-related detention
Administrative Ad Hoc Criminal Unknown

Hong Kong (China): Covid-19 and Detention

Amid a resurgence in the number of Covid-19 cases in Hong Kong, on 19 August a 37-year old Thai man detained at Castle Peak Bay Immigration Centre (CIC) was reported to have tested positive for Covid-19. The Centre for Health Protection subsequently announced that it would test approximately 200 Immigration Department staff and 400 detainees. […]

Read More…

Protesters Protesting On the Conditions of Detention and Indefinite Detention at CIC, (Grassmediaaction,

Hong Kong (China): Covid-19 and Detention

Human rights lawyers and lawmakers have raised concerns about conditions in the Castle Peak Bay Immigration Detention Centre, saying they are worried about the risk of Covid-19 spreading among detainees. The Immigration Department nonetheless stated that the health and safety of staff and detainees is a prime concern and that appropriate measures have been put […]

Read More…

Castle Peak Bay Immigration Centre in Tuen Mun, (Handout,

Hong Kong (China): Covid-19 and Detention

Hong Kong (officially the Hong Kong Special Adminsitrative Region) began taking measures to contain and combat the COVID-19 pandemic in early February after thousands of medical workers undertook a week-long strike to demand the government close the border with China and provide workers with personal protective equipment, among others measures. From 25 March 2020, the […]

Read More…

Government Quarantine Camp at the Chun Yeung Estate, (K.Y. Cheng, South China Morning Post,
Last updated: March 2024

DETENTION STATISTICS

Migration Detainee Entries
5,549
2022
7,111
2021
7,881
2020
9,289
2019
11,346
2018
11,700
2017
12,253
2016
12,916
2015
11,442
2014
12,584
2013
12,816
2012
13,210
2011
Total Migration Detainees (Entries + Remaining from previous year)
21,714
2018
24,191
2017
24,679
2013
37,105
2013
23,922
2012
29,792
2012
21,523
2011
23,876
2011
28,564
2010
31,445
2009

DETAINEE DATA

Countries of Origin (Year)
China
Indonesia
Vietnam
India
Philippines
2022
Number of Women Placed in Immigration Detention (year)
2,696
2022
3,296
2021
Number of Deaths in Immigration Custody (year)
1
2023
1
2022
1
2021
1
2019
Cases of Self-Harming and Suicide Attempts in Immigration Custody (Year)
11
2022

DETENTION CAPACITY

Immigration Detention Capacity (Specialised Immigration Facilities Only)
983
2023
571
2013
Number of Dedicated Immigration Detention Centres
4
2024
2
2014

ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT DATA

Number of Voluntary Returns & Deportations (Year)
10,110
2010
Number of People Refused Entry (Year)
2,621
2020
7,673
2019
8,235
2018
7,652
2017
8,562
2016
7,057
2015
3,581
2014
4,977
2013
3,653
2012
3,562
2011
Number of Apprehensions of Non-Citizens (Year)
52,506
2022
60,720
2021
37,947
2020
91,300
2019
72,567
2018
68,307
2017
62,113
2016
57,088
2015
56,325
2014
52,870
2013
60,883
2012
76,404
2011
65,765
2010
55,531
2009

PRISON DATA

Criminal Prison Population (Year)
7,751
2022
8,457
2016
Percentage of Foreign Prisoners (Year)
27.1%
2021
29.9%
2016
Prison Population Rate (per 100,000 of National Population)
106
2022
115
2016

POPULATION DATA

Population (Year)
7,414,909
2024
7,800,000
2023
7,050,000
2010
International Migrants (Year)
3,063,318
2024
2,962,491
2020
2,942,254
2019
2,804,800
2013
International Migrants as Percentage of Population (Year)
41.31%
2024
39.52%
2020
38.9%
2013
Refugees (Year)
260
2024
304
2023
285
2022
271
2021
245
2020
128
2019
128
2018
85
2017
86
2016
133
2015
170
2014
Ratio of Refugees Per 1000 Inhabitants (Year)
0.01
2016
0.02
2012
Asylum Applications (Year)
1,257
2022
2,528
2021
1,223
2020
1,213
2019
1,216
2018
1,843
2017
3,838
2016
5,053
2015
8,851
2014
491
2013
1,174
2012
1,231
2012
1,432
2011
1,809
2010
3,286
2009
2,198
2008
1,584
2007
528
2006
211
2005
Number of People Granted Temporary Protection Status (Year)
38
2019
41
2018
57
2017
32
2016
20
2015
1
2014
Refugee Recognition Rate (Year)
Not Available
2023
Stateless Persons (Year)
0
2022
0
2016
1
2014

SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA & POLLS

Gross Domestic Product per Capita (in USD)
$ 48,983.6,000
2022
$ 49,764.8,000
2021
$ 46,109.2,000
2020
$ 48,359,000
2019
$ 48,537.6,000
2018
$ 46,160.4,000
2017
$ 43,734.2,000
2016
$ 42,432.2,000
2015
$ 40,315.4,000
2014
$ 38,403.8,000
2013
$ 38,124,000
2013
$ 36,730.8,000
2012
Remittances to the Country (in USD)
$ 414,000,000
2022
$ 356,000,000
2011
Remittances From the Country (in USD)
$ 483,000,000
2010
Unemployment Rate
3%
2023
Human Development Index Ranking (UNDP)
4 (Very high)
2021
13 (Very high)
2012
Integration Index Score
2019
World Bank Rule of Law Index
88
1.3
2022
90
1.5
2021
91
1.6
2020
91
1.7
2019
95
1.9
2018
94
1.9
2017
91
1.8
2012

LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Does the Country Detain People for Migration, Asylum, or Citizenship Reasons?

Yes

2023
Does the Country Have Specific Laws that Provide for Migration-Related Detention?

Yes

2023
Detention-Related Legislation
Name
Year Adopted
Last Amended
Immigration (Places of Detention) Order (Cap. 115B)
1975
2023
Immigration Service (Treatment of Detained Persons) Order (Cap. 331C)
1997
2020
Immigration (Treatment of Detainees) Order (Cap. 115E)
1980
2023
Immigration Ordinance. Cap. 115.
1972
2015
Hong Kong Bill Of Rights Ordinance, Art. 5 Liberty and security of person and Art. 6 Rights of persons deprived of their liberty
1991
1998
Do Migration Detainees Have Constitutional Guarantees?
Yes/No
Constitution and articles
Adopted in
Last amendend
Yes
Cap. 383 Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance Article 1: Entitlement to rights without distinction Article 2: Right to life Article 3: No torture or inhuman treatment and no experimentation without consent Article 5: Liberty and security of person Article 6: Rights of persons deprived of their liberty
1991
2017
Additional Legislation
Name
Year Adopted
Last Amended
Prison Rules (Cap. 234A)
1954
2021
Consular Relations Ordinance. Cap 557.
2000
2015
Immigration Service Ordinance. Cap 331.
1961
2014
Regulations, Standards, Guidelines
Name
Year Published
Prison Rules (Cap. 234A)
1954
Castle Peak Bay Immigration Centre Operational Manual (Treatment of Detainees)
Ma Tau Kok Detention Centre Operational Manual (Treatment of Detained Persons)
Immigration (Places of Detention) Order. Cap. 115B. As amended (2010).
1975
IMMIGRATION (TREATMENT OF DETAINEES) ORDER. Cap. 115E. As amended.
1980
Immigration Service (Treatment of Detained Persons) Order (Cap. 331C)
1997
Bilateral/Multilateral Readmission Agreements
Name
Year in force
EU
2004
Re-Entry Ban

Yes

2024
Legal Tradition(s)

Common law

Customary law

Federal or Centralised Governing System

Centralized system

2014
Centralised or Decentralised Immigration Authority

Centralized immigration authority

2015

GROUNDS FOR DETENTION

Immigration-Status-Related Grounds

Detention to establish/verify identity and nationality

2015

Detention to prevent absconding

2015

Detention to effect removal

2015

Detention to prevent unauthorised entry at the border

2015

Detention of unauthorised persons by executive discretion

2015

Detention for unauthorised entry or stay

2015

Detention for failing to respect non-custodial measures

2015
Non-Immigration-Status-Related Grounds in Immigration Legislation

Detention on public order, threats or security grounds

2015
Criminal Penalties for Immigration-Related Violations
Fines
Incarceration
Year
Yes
Yes
2014
Grounds for Criminal Immigration-Related Incarceration / Maximum Length of Incarceration
Grounds for Incarceration
Maximum n. of Days
Year
Unauthorised stay
1095
2015
Unauthorized entry
1095
2015
Has the Country Decriminalised Immigration-Related Violations?

No

2023
Children & Other Vulnerable Groups
Group
In Law
In Practice
Year
Persons with disabilities
Not mentioned
2015
Unaccompanied minors
Provided
Yes
2014
Survivors of torture
Provided
2014
Elderly
Not mentioned
2009
Pregnant women
Not mentioned
2009

LENGTH OF DETENTION

Maximum Length of Administrative Immigration Detention

Yes

2023
Maximum Length of Detention of Asylum-Seekers

Yes

2015
Recorded Length of Immigration Detention

1825

2021
Maximum Length in Custody Prior to Detention Order

7

2015

DETENTION INSTITUTIONS

Custodial Authorities
Agency
Ministry
Typology
Year
Immigration Department
Security Bureau
Internal or Public Security
2014
Immigration Department
Security Bureau
Internal or Public Security
2013
Immigration Department
Security Bureau
Internal or Public Security
2011
Immigration Department
Security Bureau
Internal or Public Security
2009
Correctional Services
Security Bureau
Internal or Public Security
2009
Social Welfare Department
Labour and Welfare Bureau
Labour
2009
Social Welfare Department
Labour and Welfare Bureau
Labour
2006
Immigration Department
Security Bureau
Internal or Public Security
2004
Apprehending Authorities
Name
Agency
Ministry
Year
Immigration or police officer
2014
Detention Facility Management
Entity
Type
Year
Immigration Department
Governmental
2014
Social Welfare Department
Governmental
2014
Immigration Department
Governmental
2013
Immigration Department. Security Bureau.
Governmental
2013
Immigration Department
Governmental
2011
immigration Department. Security Bureau.
Governmental
2011
Correctional Services
Governmental
2009
Immigration Department
Governmental
2009
Labour and Welfare Bureau / Social Welfare Department
Governmental
2009
Labour and Welfare Bureau / Social Welfare Department
Governmental
2006
Correctional Services
Governmental
2004
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Immigration Department
Governmental
Formally Designated Detention Estate?
Designated
Type
Year
Yes
Criminal prisons
2023
Yes
Dedicated immigration detention facilities
2023
Yes
Police stations
2023
Yes
Any facility designated by relevant authority
2023
Types of Detention Facilities Used in Practice

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

2014

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS & SAFEGUARDS

Procedural Standards
Name
In Law
In Practice
Year
Complaints mechanism regarding detention conditions
Yes
Yes
2024
Access to consular assistance
Yes
Yes
2015
Right to legal counsel
Yes
2014
Information to detainees
No
Yes
2014
Independent review of detention
No
2014
Right to appeal the lawfulness of detention
No
2014
Access to asylum procedures
No
2014
Complaints mechanism regarding detention conditions
No
2014
Access to free interpretation services
Yes
2014
Duration of Time between Detention Reviews (Day)

Yes

2023
Are Non-Custodial Measures/Alternatives to Detention (ATDs) Provided in Law?
Immigration Law
Asylum/Refugee Law
Year
Yes
2024
Does the Law Stipulate Consideration of Non-Custodial Measures (ATDs) before Imposing Detention?

No

2024
Types of Non-Custodial Measures (ATDs) Provided in Law
Name
In Law
In Practice
Year
Designated non-secure housing
Yes
2020
Release
Yes
Infrequently
2015
Supervised release and/or reporting
Yes
Infrequently
2014
Release on bail
Yes
Infrequently
2014
Access to Detainees
Lawyer
Family
NGOs
Int. Monitors
Consular Reps.
Year
Yes
Yes
No
No
Unknown
2023
Recouping Detention or Removal Costs

Transporter Charged

2024

COSTS & OUTSOURCING

Estimated Detention Cost Per Detainee Per Day (in USD)

$ 214

2023

$ 186

2022

$ 148

2021

$ 99

2020

$ 101

2019

$ 92

2018

$ 86

2017
Estimated Annual Budget for Non-Custodial Measures/ATDs (in USD)

$ 74,230,769

2022

$ 69,230,769

2021

$ 61,794,872

2020

$ 68,076,923

2019

$ 75,256,410

2018

$ 93,461,538

2017

$ 62,692,308

2016

$ 32,564,102

2015

$ 26,153,846

2014

$ 24,487,179

2013

$ 18,333,333

2012

$ 19,358,974

2011
Types of Privatisation/Outsourcing

Health services

2020

COVID-19 DATA

TRANSPARENCY

Publicly Accessible List of Detention Centres?

Yes

2024
Detention Registry
Publicly available national detention registry
Includes people in administrative migration-related detention
Year
No
2024
Publicly Accessible Statistics on Numbers of People Detained?

Yes

2024
Disaggregated Detention Data?

Partial

2024
Access to Information Legislation?

Partial

2024

MONITORING

Types of Authorised Detention Monitoring Institutions
Institution
Type
Year
The Office of The Ombudsman
National Human Rights Institution (or Ombudsperson) (NHRI)
2023
Justices of the Peace
Judiciary organs
2015

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MONITORING BODIES

National Human Rights Institution (NHRI)
Present?
Official name
NHRI Recognised by GANHRI?
Visits by NHRI?
NHRI receives complaints?
NHRI releases reports on Immigration detention?
Year
No
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
2020

NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISMS (OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE)

National Preventive Mechanism (NPM-OPCAT)
NPM-OPCAT present
Official Name
NPM Visits
NPM Receive complaints
NPM Release reports
Year
No
2024

NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (NGOS)

Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) that Carry Out Detention Monitoring Visits
Regular visits
Names of NGos
Year
No
2021

GOVERNMENTAL MONITORING BODIES

Parliamentary or congressional bodies that undertake detention monitoring
Visits
Organs that carry out visits
Year
Infrequently
Subcommittee to Follow Up Issues Relating to the Unified Screening Mechanism for Non-refoulement Claims
2018
Internal Inspection Agencies that Carry Out Detention Monitoring Visits
Visits
Agencies that carry out visits
Year
Yes
Justices of the Peace
2024
Internal inspection reports on migration-related detention
Report
Date
Annual Report on Justices of the Peace Visits
2022
Do parliamentary organs have capacity to receive complaints?

No

2024

INTERNATIONAL DETENTION MONITORING

INTERNATIONAL TREATIES & TREATY BODIES

International Treaties Ratified
Ratification Year
Observation Date
CRPD, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
2008
2008
CAT, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
1997
1997
CEDAW, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
1997
1997
CRC, Convention on the Rights of the Child
1997
1997
CRSSP, Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons
1997
1997
ICCPR, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
1997
1997
ICERD, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
1997
1997
ICESCR, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
1997
1997
VCCR, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
1997
1997
Ratio of relevant international treaties ratified
Ratio: 9/19
Treaty Reservations
Reservation Year
Observation Date
CRC Article 37
1997
1997
Relevant Recommendations or Observations Issued by Treaty Bodies
Recommendation Year
Observation Date
Committee against Torture (c) Establish confidential complaints mechanisms in all places of detention to facilitate the submission of complaints by victims of torture and ill-treatment to the investigating body, including for obtaining medical evidence in support of their allegations, and to ensure in practice that complainants are protected against any reprisals as a consequence of their complaint or any evidence given 2016
2016
2016
Committee on the Rights of the Child "82. The Committee notes as positive the decision of Hong Kong, China to grant asylum-seeking and refugee children access to the national public school system. However, it is concerned about the lack of special care and protection for asylum-seeking children upon their arrival and the administrative practice of detaining such children, as well as unaccompanied children arriving in Hong Kong, China by air and children who are refused entry, in juvenile detention facilities.[...] 84. The Committee recommends that Hong Kong, China: (a) Cease the administrative practice of detaining asylum-seeking and refugee children;" 2013
2013
2013

> UN Special Procedures

> UN Universal Periodic Review

Relevant Recommendations or Observations from the UN Universal Periodic Review
Observation Date
Yes “28.14 Consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and establishing a national human rights institution in accordance with the principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (the Paris Principles) (Niger); Consider becoming a party to the International Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (Philippines); Encourage China to consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, including for the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative Regions (Indonesia);” 2021 3rd
2018
Global Detention Project and Partner Submissions to Universal Periodic Review
Date of Submission
Observation Date
2023 https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/china-joint-submission-to-the-universal-periodic-review Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN) 4th Pending
2023
2023

> Global Compact for Migration (GCM)

> Global Compact on Refugees (GCR)

REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS

HEALTH CARE PROVISION

Provision of Healthcare in Detention Centres
Limited or Some Detention Centres Only
2024
Medical Screening upon Arrival at Detention Centres (within 48 hours)
Some centres only
2024
Psychological Evaluation upon Arrival at Detention Centres
No
2024
Doctor on Duty at Detention Centres
Daily
2024
Nurse on Duty at Detention Centres
No nurse on duty
2024
Psychologist Visits to Detention Centres
No regular visits
2024
Inadequate health provisions
Psychological care
2024
Barriers to care
Use of solitary confinement
2024

HEALTH IMPACTS

Health Impacts
Deaths
2023
Self-harming
2022
Deaths
2022
Self-harming
2021
Deaths
2021
Deaths
2021
Deaths
2019

COVID-19

Country Updates
Amid a resurgence in the number of Covid-19 cases in Hong Kong, on 19 August a 37-year old Thai man detained at Castle Peak Bay Immigration Centre (CIC) was reported to have tested positive for Covid-19. The Centre for Health Protection subsequently announced that it would test approximately 200 Immigration Department staff and 400 detainees. On 20 June, more than 20 detainees from India, Pakistan, and various African countries launched a hunger strike in protest over their indefinite detention at the facility. As of 25 August, some detainees remained on strike, after 58 days. At its peak, there were 28 participants in the hunger strike: four detainees have been released and two hospitalised. Upon release from hospital, one person reported being physically abused by detention centre staff. Of those participating in the action, some had been detained for nearly two years, and six had been detained for more than one year. The Immigration Department claimed that the hunger strikers were consuming other food despite their refusal to collect meals from the facility, and that it had been providing counselling for the detainees to discuss their situation. It also said that most of the hunger strikers had criminal records involving serious or violent crimes and were awaiting deportation. The Castle Peak Bay “Concern Group” reported that the hunger strikers had been placed in separate rooms for observation, but that they had not been provided with any medical assistance—in spite of some detainees’ pre-existing conditions. For example, one striker who has a tumor in his left arm has not been given access to the necessary drugs to improve his condition. More than 2,000 people have signed a petition organised by the CIC Concern Group to support the strikers’ action. In addition to the indefinite detention detainees face at the Castle Peak Bay Immigration Centre, concerns have been raised regarding the deleterious hygiene and medical conditions in the facility. First raised by lawmakers and activists in May (see 12 May update on this platform), the inadequate conditions were again flagged in mid-August when the findings from a survey of 100 detainees, former detainees, and family members were published by the Concern Group. The survey found that 48.72 percent of interviewees thought that they did not have enough access to medical assistance, while 46.15 percent thought that CIC’s facilities were inadequate. Many raised issues such as insufficient dental hygiene products including toothpaste, a lack of hot water in the winter, and a lack of space to hang their laundry. Responding to concerns regarding detention conditions during the pandemic, the government has detailed the measures that it has taken to prevent and control the virus inside the facility: “All detainees on admission to CIC are required to undergo a medical examination conducted by a duty medical officer to ensure that their health condition is normal and to prevent the transmission of infectious diseases to other detainees. For detainees arriving in Hong Kong from the Mainland or overseas countries within 14 days before admission to CIC, they will be subject to a 14-day quarantine and medical surveillance at a designated area of CIC, during which they will not have any contact with other detainees. In addition, all detainees newly admitted to CIC are required to undergo the COVID-19 viral test. Each detainee will be provided with a surgical mask and have body temperature taken every day.”
Human rights lawyers and lawmakers have raised concerns about conditions in the Castle Peak Bay Immigration Detention Centre, saying they are worried about the risk of Covid-19 spreading among detainees. The Immigration Department nonetheless stated that the health and safety of staff and detainees is a prime concern and that appropriate measures have been put in place to avoid contamination. In addition, a spokesman for the Department of Health said that if detainees “show any symptoms of Covid-19, they will be sent to public hospitals.” Opened in 2005, the Castle Peak Bay (CPB) facility has a total capacity of around 400 places, although it is not known how many people are currently detained there. Most detainees are from Vietnam, Central America, South America, India, and Pakistan. Men and women are held on different floors in the facility. Concerns were voiced following reports of “rats in the premises, malfunctioning toilets, a lack of bleach for disinfection, no access or insufficient access to soap and hand sanitisers.” Karen McClellan, a lawyer at Daly & Associates, said that they were very concerned about Covid-19 spreading in immigration detention centres: “This is an area that we’re very concerned is falling through the cracks, putting an already vulnerable group even more at risk.” Dr. Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung, a Hong Kong politician, also raised concerns about hygiene after visiting the centre on 12 March. He was shocked to see detainees in a day room using ladles to scoop water from a plastic bucket to drink. He also observed that detainees spent most of their time in day rooms the size of a regular classroom, with around 40 to 60 people in each room. The Immigration Department stated that cleaning and disinfection had been stepped up at the centre since the outbreak of the disease. New arrivals with recent travel history outside Hong Kong have reportedly been segregated and observed and the centre has been collecting saliva samples for Covid-19 tests, but the Department did not mention when this began or how many detainees have been tested for now." In the past, many NGOs have criticised conditions at Hong Kong's two detention facilities, including abuses by security guards and lack of food and unsanitary conditions. Multiple incidents of mistreatment have previously been reported at CPB. In 2019, Yuli Riswati, an Indonesian migrant domestic worker and journalist, was deported from Hong Kong to Indonesia after reporting on the 2019 anti-extradition law protests. Before she was deported, Yuli was detained for 28 days. While in detention, Yuli was subject to a strip-search by male doctors (despite being Muslim) and was declined adequate medical treatment despite suffering from vomiting and flu. This resulted in her physical deterioration and psychological depression.
Hong Kong (officially the Hong Kong Special Adminsitrative Region) began taking measures to contain and combat the COVID-19 pandemic in early February after thousands of medical workers undertook a week-long strike to demand the government close the border with China and provide workers with personal protective equipment, among others measures. From 25 March 2020, the government began to deny entry to all non-Hong Kong residents coming from overseas countries and regions by plane. Any non-Hong Kong residents coming from China, Macao and/or Taiwan (Province of China) also began to be denied entry to Hong Kong if they had been to any overseas countries and regions in the last 14 days. The government began to deny entry to all visitors from Hubei province, and any non-Hong Kong residents who have visited Hubei province in the last 14 days, to Hong Kong, from 27 January 2020 onwards. There do not appear to have been changes in immigration detention policies in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Adella Namagembe, the chairperson of Refugee Union (the city’s first union run by and for refugees and migrants), told the Global Detention Project (GDP) that asylum seekers continue to be detained in immigration detention centres. Detainees are being tested for COVID-19 and are given surgical masks, hand sanitizer, handwashing soap, and toilet cleaning products. The Hong Kong government has issued a Red Outbound Travel Alert (OTA) on all overseas countries/territories based on public health considerations in view of the health risks arising from the persistent and rapid increase in the number of COVID-19 cases globally. Namagembe told the GDP that deportations do not appear to be taking place. Refugees, who are officially referred to as “non-refoulement claimants” due to the lack of a refugee policy, are given food vouchers worth HKD40 (approximately 5.15USD) and a housing allowance of HK1500 (approximately 190USD)––levels of assistance which have not been adjusted with inflation since 2014. On 26 February 2020, the Refugee Union issued a letter to the Social Welfare Department, requesting increases in housing, utilities, transport allowance, allowances and providing a clothing allowance. It also asked for the allocation of a food allowance in cash rather than through vouchers (which are only valid for one chain of supermarket in Hong Kong and which are often disregarded by supermarket staff) and for the government to lift its restrictions on what items can be purchased. Namagembe said: “Generally, we need more financial support due to the fact that we are not allowed to work, everything currently is expensive due to the COVID-19 breakout. The consumption is high because kids are at home all the time. Even adults needs to maintain their health by having a balanced diet.” On 19 March, the Social Welfare Department replied that it had shared notices and guidelines about the health advice and preventive measures of COVID-19 issued by the Centre for Health Protection to ISS-HK, including some that had been translated into ethnic minority languages. It stated: “Upon receipt of donation of face masks and sanitising items from individuals or private organizations, if any, SWD/ISS-HK will assist to distribute these items to the needy bodies including NRCs according to the wishes of donors.” It also stated: “the Government has to emphasize that the provision of humanitarian assistance aims to ensure that claimants will not become destitute during their presence in Hong Kong, and thus the level of assistance is to meet their basic needs so as to avoid any magnet effect which may have serious implications on the long-term sustainability of such assistance and the immigration of Hong Kong.” Refugees have continued to lodge personal complaint letters, indicating the urgent need for government support to meet their basic needs, but to date have not received positive responses. Asylum seekers are asked to report to the Immigration Department regularly. Namagembe said that the Immigration Department had lengthened the period between reporting obligations as a result of the outbreak: “Currently, all of them [asylum seekers] report to immigration on the same date every 6 weeks.” She said that the Immigration Department is checking the temperature of asylum seekers when they report. Migrant domestic workers have been excluded from many of the government’s virus containment policies. In Hong Kong, there is a mandatory live-in requirement for migrant domestic workers. In January, the Labour Department (LD) came under fire after it issued a public notice encouraging domestic workers “to stay home on their rest day in order to safeguard their personal health and to reduce the risk of the spread of the novel coronavirus in the community.” The organization Mission for Migrant Workers (MFMW) stated that workers had subsequently been forced to stay at home on their rest days by their employers, and even asked to resign if they did not do so. According to a recent study by MFMW and Asian Migrants Coordinating Body, 40 percent of 1,127 migrant domestic workers surveyed in March 2020 said that their labour rights had been curtailed during the outbreak. This included not being given masks or sanitizer or being forced to work excessive hours. Some workers have noted that, as a result of the government’s quarantine policies, they are also being deprived of the ability to take their annual leave (7 to 14 days), given that the compulsory quarantine period imposed by the government is 14 days. In addition, migrant workers have raised concerned about employers who return home from overseas who are subsequently required to undergo a 14-day quarantine period. The Hong Kong Federation of Asian Domestic Workers Unions has criticised the government for its lack of clear quarantine guidelines for workers and employers, including its lack of guidance on what to do if workers encounter inadequate accommodation or unlawful dismissal in relation to quarantine policies. The Immigration Department has announced a “flexibility arrangement” for migrant domestic workers. The Commissioner for Labour has given in-principle consent for all migrant domestic worker contracts that will expire on or before 31 March 2020, to be extended up till 31 May 2020, provided that such variation is mutually agreed by both the employer and the worker and approved by the Director of Immigration. They have also given further in-principle consent for all migrant domestic worker contracts that will expire on or before 30 June 2020, to extend the period of employment up to July 31, 2020, on the same terms.
Did the country release immigration detainees as a result of the pandemic?
Yes
2022
Did the country use legal "alternatives to detention" as part of pandemic detention releases?
Unknown
2022
Did the country Temporarily Cease or Restrict Issuing Detention Orders?
No
2020
Did the Country Adopt These Pandemic-Related Measures for People in Immigration Detention?
Yes (Yes) Yes Yes Yes
2022
Did the Country Lock-Down Previously "Open" Reception Facilities, Shelters, Refugee Camps, or Other Forms of Accommodation for Migrant Workers or Other Non-Citizens?
Unknown
2022
Were cases of COVID-19 reported in immigration detention facilities or any other places used for immigration detention purposes?
Yes
2020
Did the Country Cease or Restrict Deportations/Removals During any Period After the Onset of the Pandemic?
Yes but restrictons ended
2021
Did the Country Release People from Criminal Prisons During the Pandemic?
Unknown
2022
Did Officials Blame Migrants, Asylum Seekers, or Refugees for the Spread of COVID-19?
Yes
2022
Did the Country Restrict Access to Asylum Procedures?
Unknown
2022
Did the Country Commence a National Vaccination Campaign?
Yes
2021
Were Populations of Concern Included/Excluded From the National Vaccination Campaign?
Unknown (Included) Partially Included Partially Included Partially Included
2022