No detention centre mapping data


Egypt Immigration Detention

Egypt has long been an important destination and crossing point for international migrants and asylum seekers in the Mediterranean region. Since the onset of conflicts in Syria and Gaza, the country has also become an important destination for Syrian nationals and Palestinians. Egypt's response to these migration pressures has a times been characterized by violence and arbitrariness. According to unofficial sources, thousands of Africans, many trafficked in the Sinai by Bedouin tribes, have disappeared in recent years, some of whom were later found confined in Egyptian jails. Syrians, who were initially welcomed by Egypt, now find themselves frequently detained in police stations. And Palestinians fleeing the devastation wrought by Israeli bombing have reportedly been shot at and arrested by police as they attempt to leave Egyptian shores in smuggling boats heading for Europe. The legal status of detainees is often unclear as they shift between criminal and administrative forms of custody. The Global Detention Project estimates that nearly 60 detention facilities, nearly all of them either prisons or police cells, have been used in recent years for immigration-related detention.

Quick Facts


Immigration detainees (2014): 3,051
International migrants (2015): 491,600
New asylum applications (2016): 30,672

Profile Updated: October 2014

Egypt Immigration Detention Profile

Against a backdrop of harsh civil society crackdowns in Egypt, ongoing political turmoil in the Middle East, and severe poverty and repression in nearby African countries like Eritrea, refugees, asylum seekers, and unauthorized migrants in Egypt remain subject to numerous abuses and face enormous challenges regarding their futures.  

Egypt has long been a destination and transit country for large numbers of asylum seekers and irregular migrants, including Sudanese, Iraqis, Ethiopians, Somalis, and Eritreans, as well as more recently people fleeing violence in Syria and Gaza. Since early 2013, the Egyptian police have reportedly detained more than 6,800 persons fleeing Syria (Kingsley 2014). . 

There have been reports of Egyptian soldiers firing on smuggling vessels heading for Europe that are packed with Palestinians fleeing the destruction in Gaza wrought by Israeli bombing during its recent conflict with Hamas (Rollins 2014; Beaumont and Kingsley 2014). To accommodate those detained during these operations, authorities in Alexandria have reportedly begun using a youth centre in Alexandria (Rollins 2014), bolstering a large network of police stations in the region that been used recently for migrant detention operations (see the section “Detention Infrastructure” below).

Egypt is also an important country of emigration. According to official statistics, some 10 million Egyptian nationals (more than 10 percent of the total population) were living abroad as of 2011 (DW 2011). 

Migrants and asylum seekers in Egypt are particularly vulnerable to detention and deportation. During more than three decades, the country was under an emergency decree, which gave authorities enormous latitude on who they could detain and why. Although these powers were mainly targeted at citizens and have recently been rescinded, security personnel in the country can apprehend foreign nationals for a variety of reasons. 

An important legal justification for detaining migrants is provided in criminal law. According to information received by the Global Detention Project, unauthorized migrants are often charged with criminal violations stemming from their alleged irregular status and then incarcerated in prison facilities, which are notorious for being overcrowded and lacking basic detention conditions. 

However, while it appears that migrants are frequently prosecuted for status-related violations, authorities reportedly avoid imposing criminal sanctions, instead keeping migrants in a form of administrative detention until they can be deported. Rights groups have repeatedly criticised the country for arbitrarily detaining non-citizens and using military tribunals to try them. 

Egypt has also been widely condemned for implementing a “shoot-to-stop” policy targeting migrants crossing from Egypt to Israel; denying detained migrants access to appeal; undertaking mass forced returns of Eritreans and Syrians, who face persecution in their countries; preventing UNHCR and other rights bodies access to detainees; and indefinitely detaining stateless persons and unregistered asylum seekers. 

Observers have also noted an apparent correlation between European efforts to block migrant routes across the Mediterranean and increases in the trafficking of migrants across the Sinai desert. According to one study, between 2007 and 2013, as many as 30,000 people were trafficked in the Sinai (Reisen, Meron and Rijken 2013).

In some cases, victims of trafficking are held in harsh conditions by Bedouin tribes. If they manage to escape and make it to Israel, they are subject to detention for up to three years under a new law adopted in Israel (PHRI/HL2012). If, on the other hand, they attempt to reach Cairo, they can be detained for long periods in police jails or military camps. According to unofficial estimates, thousands of victims of trafficking in Egypt have disappeared in recent years, some of whom were later found confined in Egyptian jails (Van Reisen, Meron and Rijken 2012, 2013). 

Detention Policy

Legal provisions relevant to immigration-related detention in Egypt are contained in numerous legal instruments. These include the 2014 Egyptian Constitution, the 1960 Law on Entry and Residence, the Criminal Code, and various presidential decrees. Application of the law can vary considerably from case to case, depending on where a person is detained, the nationality of the detainee, and the detaining authority in a particular case. Numerous observers have criticised Egypt for arbitrary and unlawful detentions (AI 2013b; HRW 2013) and for trying non-citizen civilians in military tribunals for illegal entry into the country (HRW 2008). 

Constitutional guarantees. Egypt has voted on a series of Constitutions since the 2011 ouster of President Hosni Mubarak. The most recent constitutional referendum took place in January 2014. 

The 2014 Constitution provides several guarantees that can be relevant to the situation of detained non-citizens, including the right to challenge detention (Article 54), the right to be protected from torture and abuse (Article 55), and the provision of judicial oversight over all places of detention (Article 56). Non-citizens who are charged with crimes stemming from their immigration status are to be considered innocent until proven guilty in a fair court of law (Article 96). 

Article 54 of the Constitution provides that “every person whose freedom is restricted shall be immediately notified of the reasons therefore; shall be informed of his/her rights in writing; shall be immediately enabled to contact his/her relatives and lawyer; and shall be brought before the investigation authority within twenty four (24) hours as of the time of restricting his/her freedom. Investigation may not start with the person unless his/her lawyer is present. A lawyer shall be seconded for persons who do not have one. Necessary assistance shall be rendered to people with disability according to procedures prescribed by Law.” 

Grounds for administrative immigration detention. It is challenging to distinguish between administrative and criminal detention in cases involving non-citizens. Asylum seekers, refugees, and undocumented migrants can be subject to both criminal penalties and administrative detention for unauthorized entry or residence. Nevertheless, it appears that while criminal grounds for status-related violations may be used as the basis for arresting non-citizens, authorities generally do not pursue criminal sanctions, instead opting to hold these people in a form of administrative detention until they are deported or their cases otherwise resolved by immigration authorities (Undisclosed source 2011b). (For more on this phenomenon, see the section on “Criminalisation of immigration-related offenses” below.) 

The principle immigration-related laws governing the arrest, detention, and deportation of non-citizens are The Law of Entry and Residence of Aliens in the Territories of the United Arab Republic and their Departure Therefrom (Law No. 89 of 1960 as amended by law No. 88 of 2005) and Presidential Decree Security of the Eastern Border of Arab Republic of Egypt (1995). The applicable law depends on where and when a migrant is apprehended. 

The main function of administrative detention is to enforce the removal of non-citizens. 

According to Article 27 of the Law of Entry and Residence, authorities can keep non-citizens in detention after they complete criminal sentences until they are deported. 

The Minister of Interior has the authority to deport non-citizens and can order temporary detention until deportation is possible. When a deportation decision is difficult to enforce, the Director of Passports, Immigration and Nationality Administration can order an alien to reside at a specific place and periodically report to a police station until deported (Art. 30). 

A foreign national can be issued with an order of deportation by the Director of Passports, Immigration and Nationality and Administration if he/she: enters the country by “illegal methods”; fails to obtain a residence permit following the expiry of an entry visa; violates the “purpose” for which he/she obtained residency; fails to depart from the country within 15 days from the expiry date of the residence period, unless a request for renewal has been approved prior to the expiry of the original residence period; or fails to depart from the country within 15 days from the date of being notified of the refusal to grant residency or renewal of residency (Law of Entry and Residence Art. 31 Bis). 

Article 23 of the Law of Entry and Residence provides that non-citizens who “contravene” without permission the original purpose for which they were authorised to enter or reside in Egypt can be penalized with fines of up to two thousand pounds and may be banished from the country (Art. 42). “Aliens” who represent “a threat to the State and country security and safety, internally or abroad, or to its national economy, public health, public moral, or public tranquillity, or [who is] a burden on the state” can be issued with a deportation order (Art. 26). 

Length of administrative detention. Length of administrative detention. The Egyptian government does not release statistics related to the actual/average length of time for administrative detention (Undisclosed source 2014). There is no maximum length of administrative detention in Egyptian law. 

According to recent information provided to the Global Detention Project, undocumented migrants generally no longer serve criminal prisons sentences for violations related to entry or stay (Undisclosed source 2014). However, there have been cases in the past in which foreign nationals apprehended at the Sudanese border and convicted of illegal entry have spent several years in prison, often being transferred from prison to prison as they shift between criminal and administrative procedures. In one case, a group of foreign nationals apprehended at that border were initially detained at a police station in southern Egypt. After completing a one-year prison sentence for illegal entry at the Borg El Arab Prison, they were confined for an additional three months at the same police station where they were initially detained because they were unable to pay the fine for illegal entry. After this three-month period, the migrants were transferred to the Qanater Men’s Prison, registered with an immigration status and then kept in detention for an additional period of time, until deportation (Undisclosed source 2011e). 

When deportation is not possible, detention can be indefinite (Undisclosed source 2011b). According to reports on Eritreans trafficked in Egypt between 2010 and 2012, detained Eritreans have been held in overcrowded cells in police stations for up to 18 months (HRW 2014b). 

Criminalisation of immigration-related offenses. Most breaches of immigration law appear to carry prison sentences. Criminal sanctions, however, are reportedly rarely applied and there is little information available that accurately documents the nature of the decision-making process for placing asylum-seekers, migrants, and refugees in detention (Undisclosed source 2014). 

Activists in Egypt who work with detainees have reported to the Global Detention Project that decisions related to release or length of time spent in prison are distinctly arbitrary, particularly in the case of Syrians. One source in Egypt reports that after being arrested and detained for unauthorized entry in Egypt, entire groups of Syrians have been “kept in detention for months, others released, [and] others pushed to leave the country with no apparent consistency with regard to the decision taken by authorities” (Undisclosed source 2014). 

Under Presidential Decree Security of the Eastern Border of Arab Republic of Egypt (1995) anyone convicted of entering or exiting the country illegally through the eastern border can face imprisonment and a fine of up to five thousand Egyptian pounds (Art. 2). 

Article 3 of the Law of Entry and Residence prohibits migrants from entering and exiting the country at any points other than those designated as official border crossing points. Article 2 of this law prohibits entry and exit without a valid legal document/passport. Foreign nationals who violate Articles 2 and 3 can face a criminal trial and/or penalties that include imprisonment for up to six months and/or a fine of up to one thousand Egyptian pounds and subject to criminal trial or execution of the penalty can be deportation from the country (Art. 41). These penalties are also applied to asylum seekers, despite the protections against such measures provided in the 1951 Refugee Convention, to which Egypt is a signatory. 

Non-citizens who violate the terms of an order of deportation or banishment, fail to reside at a designated residence, or provide false statements or knowingly submit false documentation to Egyptian authorities can be sentenced with up to two years imprisonment and/or fined up to two thousand pounds (Law of Entry and Residence Arts. 38, 40). Penalties are more severe for foreign nationals who (a) are citizens of a country in a state of war with Egypt; or (b) entered Egypt at the border areas listed by decree of the minister of interior, in agreement with the minister of foreign affairs (Law of Entry and Residence Art. 41). 

In practice, the prosecution of unauthorized immigrants is not systematically applied in Egypt. According to one source interview by the GDP, since 2008, those arrested for illegal entry to/exit from the country have generally received a suspended sentence—a sentence issued by a judge which will not be enforced if the defendant meets certain conditions—exempting the migrant from serving the sentence. In most cases, judges refer these cases to the immigration department, which reviews the status of the foreign national and determines whether they should be released, deported, or remain in detention (Undisclosed source 2014). 

According to one observer, “the criminalisation of irregular migration is considered disproportionate to the violation and can often lead to additional human rights abuses—a particular concern in Egypt, where, as the UN and human rights groups have noted, torture in prison is widespread, and where non-nationals frequently are denied access to procedural safeguards and adequate legal representation” (Hilal and Samy 2008, p.12). 

Re-entry ban. Deported persons are prohibited from re-entering the country unless granted permission to do so by the Minister of Interior (Law of Entry and Residence Art. 31). Non-citizens found to violate this article can be subject to imprisonment for a minimum of one year (Art. 39). 

The Law of Entry and Residence (Article 16) requires that aliens residing in Egypt obtain a residency permit and depart form the country upon termination of residence. 

Procedural standards for immigration detainees. The Law of Entry and Residence does not contain any provisions guaranteeing rights to detained migrants, such as access to a lawyer. Asylum seekers, refugees, stateless persons, and migrants arrested for illegal entry at non-authorised border points fall within the jurisdiction of the nearest military tribunal and have no access to appeal, a practice that has been criticized as violation of Egypt’s obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Art. 14) and the Arab Charter on Human and People’s Rights, which provides for due process and a fair trial (Art. 26). Irregular migrants and refugees are sometimes given an appeal in court, though this appears to occur on an ad hoc basis (Undisclosed source 2011a). 

According to Egyptian law, defendants in criminal cases have a right to access legal counsel. Article 96 of the 2014 Constitution establishes that the accused is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and provides guarantees for legal defence. Additionally, the Criminal Code (Law 214) establishes that the General Attorney nominate a lawyer for any individual accused of a criminal offence. However, this provision is reportedly generally not enforced in cases involving allegations of illegal entry/presence in the country. Individuals arrested are first referred to a general or military prosecutor (according to the area of arrest), who then refers the case to a court (civil or military), where the accused is typically unable to exercise his/her right to a defence as no lawyer is provided (Undisclosed source 2011e). 

The Code of Criminal Procedure contains safeguards relating to persons who are being detained on criminal charges. Under the Code, all persons held in detention, regardless of whether they are Egyptian citizens, enjoy the same safeguards available under the law. Every person who is arrested or held in precautionary detention must be informed immediately of the reasons for his arrest or detention in a language that he understands. He has the right to communicate with anyone he chooses and is entitled to avail himself of the services of a lawyer (Code of Criminal Procedure, art. 139) (CMW 2006). 

Apprehending authorities, custodial authorities, and jurisdictions. Under Presidential Decree 204/2010, which defines the border of the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Egyptian police have the power to arrest/detain people for immigration related reasons. At border points and in military zones such as the Sinai Peninsula the army may apprehend individuals for unauthorized entry as the military is responsible for guarding the borders of southern and western Egypt. 

The Interior Ministry, which is responsible for the administration of prisons in Egypt, country has custody over immigration detainees held in prisons. It also has the authority to deport non-citizens and to order temporary detention until deportation is possible (Art 27 Law of Entry and Residence).  

When the military removed President Mubarak in February 2011, the jurisdiction of the military was greatly expanded, which empowered the military to arrest people in areas outside military zones and refer the cases to a military tribunal. In January 2013 the Shura Council, Egypt’s partially elected upper house, passed a law that gives military officers the right to arrest civilians and bring them before military courts. The law will come into force after ratification by the President and publication in the official gazette (HRW 2013a). 

At least four Egyptian military tribunals try persons detained for crossing borders: in Aswan and Hurghada (for irregular entries from Sudan); in Marsa Matruh (from Libya); and in Ismailia (those entering the Sinai military zone) (HRW 2014b).  Some detainees taken to the military court in Ismailia and then returned to police stations in the Sinai were unable to say whether they had been convicted of any offenses and given prison sentences (HRW 2014b). 

The Presidential Decree Security of the Eastern Border of Arab Republic of Egypt (1995) prohibits the movement of persons within one hundred and fifty meters of the eastern border (with Israel), between Rafah in the north and Taba in the south, apart from Rafah city and other locations permitted by law or the military (Art. 1). The military has the authority to sentence anyone who violates this law with imprisonment for at least six months (Art. 2, 5). 

Victims of trafficking. The trafficking of foreign nationals across Egypt has been a major concern for many years. In 2010, the country adopted Law 64 on Combating Trafficking in Persons, Article 21 of which provides that victims of trafficking cannot be held criminally responsible for trafficking-related violations. 

Some experts have noted that the law has inconsistencies. For instance, one lawyer wrote that while Article 22 stipulates that victims of trafficking who do not hold “permanent residence permits” in Egypt shall be returned to their country safely and swiftly, there is no such thing as a “permanent residence permit” in Egypt (Badawy 2011). 

According to one study, between 2007 and 2013, up to 30,000 persons were trafficked in the Sinai, of whom between 5,000-10,000 died as a consequence of trafficking (Reisen, Meron and Rijken 2013). Many victims of trafficking are held in harsh conditions by Bedouin tribes. If they manage to escape or make it to Israel, they can be subject to detention for up to three years under a new law adopted in Israel (PHRI/HL2012). 

Trafficking victims who endeavour to travel to Cairo are often apprehended en route and placed in detention centres. According to one unofficial estimate, some 4,000 people have “disappeared” in the Sinai in recent years, many of whom were late found detained in Egyptian jails (Van Reisen, Meron and Rijken 2012, 2013). One source in Egypt told the GDP that “those attempting to reach Cairo … are at risk of being arrested as they lack the necessary documentation (in particular due to the high number of check points on the way to Cairo). If apprehended in such circumstances they would face the arrest and indefinite detention as if they were arrested at the Egyptian-Israeli border” (Undisclosed source 2014).

There are allegations of the police working with traffickers. In one case, trafficking victims reported that a group of hostages from Ethiopia and Eritrea were able to subdue their traffickers and bring them to a police station in southern Sinai. The police, however, allegedly set the traffickers free and put the migrants in prison (Reisen, Meron and Rikjen 2013). 

Sinai is a military zone and anyone arrested there can be brought before a military prosecutor and subsequently tried before a military court, despite the fact that they lack requisite independence for a fair trial (Undisclosed source 2011e). 

During military operations in the Sinai that began in June 2013, the Egyptian army reportedly raided “torture houses” used by traffickers to hold—and torture—people as they waited for ransoms to be paid. Some of the houses had rooms that featured “hooks on the ceilings from which the kidnapped are hung as they are beaten” (Hassouri 2013). Many of the people rescued by the military from these houses were subsequently placed in detention and charged with “illegal entry” into Egypt. There were apparently 144 such “rescued” persons in detention in Egypt at the end of 2013. Numerous observers contend that Egyptian authorities make no attempt to identify trafficking victims among migrants transiting the Sinai and do not investigate allegations of collusion between security forces collusion and traffickers (HRW 2014a; Reisen, Meron and Rijken 2013; USDS 2012). 

In 2010 and 2012, the European Parliament adopted resolutions on human trafficking in Sinai. The resolutions urged Egyptian and Israeli security forces to avoid the use of lethal force against undocumented migrants and called for this topic to be placed as a matter of high priority on the agenda of political dialogue in Egypt (EP 2012). 

“Shoot-to-stop” policy. Recent reports received by the Global Detention Project indicate that Egypt’s “shoot-to-stop” policy targeting migrants attempting to cross from Egypt into Israel is no longer being implemented (Undisclosed source 2014). The practice was the focus of global outrage for many years (USCRI 2009; AI 2008a; HRW 2010a, p.494; UN News Service 2010a).  

However, there have been reports that soldiers have shot at migrants and asylum seekers attempting to leave Egyptian shores by boat on various occasions during 2013 and 2014. In one incident from October 2014, soldiers allegedly fired on Palestinians at a beach near Alexandria as they attempted to board a smuggling vessel, leaving one person dead (Rollins 2014).

In another incident from 2013, the Egyptian Navy fired on boats at sea. According to an Amnesty International Report: “In the early hours of 17 September, a boat carrying at least 200 people left the Egyptian port city of Alexandria. It was heading to Italy when it was intercepted and pulled back to shore by the Egyptian Navy. Most of those on board the boat were refugees from Syria. When Amnesty International later interviewed some of the refugees, they described how, as they saw the Egyptian Navy ship approaching their boat, people started pleading with the Navy not to shoot, telling them that there were children on board. The Navy approached the boat and, according to witnesses, fired several shots into the hull of the boat. As far as Amnesty International is aware no shots were fired from the boat carrying the refugees. The incident resulted in the death of two people who were shot: Fadwa Taha, a 50-year-old Palestinian refugee woman from Syria, and Amr Dailool, a 30-year-old Syrian refugee. According to one of the refugees who was on the boat, the shots fired by the Navy narrowly missed children. All of the refugees were detained by police” (AI 2013b).

Some 85 unarmed migrants were reportedly killed at the border between July 2007 and October 2010 as part of the previous shoot-to-stop policy in the Sinai(HRW 2010b). In 2011, at least 22 African migrants attempting to cross the Sinai were killed by the Egyptian Border Police (HRW 2012a). According to the U.S. Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report 2012, “Egyptian border security personnel in the Sinai continued to shoot some undocumented migrants attempting to enter Israel, including suspected trafficking victims, often killing them” (USDS 2012). 

The shoot-to-stop policy was introduced in 2007 after intense pressure fromIsrael to halt the smuggling of migrants across the Sinai border (AI 2008a, p.3). Many migrants are also apprehended at this border, stripped of their belongings, referred to the nearest military prosecutor and military court, and charged by the military prosecutor with “attempting to exit unlawfully the Egyptian eastern border.” According to one observer, the court generally suspends the sentence of these migrants and hands them over to the immigration department to commence deportation procedures (Undisclosed source 2011b; AI 2008, p.2-3). Only a handful of countries—including MoroccoTunisia and Turkey—also criminalize “illegal exit.” 

Deportation practices. Egypt has been heavily criticised for forcibly returning migrants and asylum seekers to places where they could be subject to persecution and possibly torture. Of particular concern in this regard are Eritreans, some of whom have reportedly been deported to Ethiopia after being apprehended while attempting to cross the Sinai (HRW 2014b). 

The forced return of Eritreans has been a long-standing problem in Egypt. For instance, non-governmental group reported in 2008 that that during a single week in June of that year up to 1,200 asylum seekers were returned to Eritrea despite warnings that they were at grave risk of immediate detention, torture and other ill-treatment on their return. Those returned—including pregnant women and children—were at times subjected to violence and mistreatment during their deportation procedures and denied access to appeal mechanisms and UNHCR. Many of the deportees were subsequently detained at Eritrea’s Wia desert prison (AI 2009, p.6). 

More recently, Human Rights Watch reported that in October 2011 “Prison officials in Shallal gave Eritrean embassy officials access to 118 detained Eritrean men who were asylum seekers and beat them to force them to sign paperwork agreeing to return to Eritrea. Egyptian authorities announced they would deport the group to Eritrea” (HRW 2012a). 

Egypt has also been criticized for its treatment of people fleeing the conflict in Syria. While it initially maintained an open door policy for these refugees, it adopted stricter entry requirements in 2013 for Syrian nationals. These requirements apparently led to more than 200 Syrians being deported to Syria, Lebanon, and other countries during a single day in July 2013 (AI 2013). 

According to the euro-Mediterranean Migreurop network, the Egyptian authorities ask foreigners about to be deported to pay for their air ticket. Most sub-Saharans detained in Egypt for illegal entry or exit do not have the means to shoulder such costs and various hundred foreigners remain stranded in Egyptian prisons. Migreurop also reports that according to local sources there have been cases of persons who have thus spent more than four years in administrative detention (Migreurop 2013). 

Asylum Seekers and stateless persons. Egypt is party to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention and its Protocol, with reservations in relation to personal status, rationing, public relief and education, labour legislation, and social security. It is also a signatory to the African Union Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa. Additionally, Article 91 of the 2014 Constitution provides that political asylum must be available to anyone who has been persecuted for defending human rights, peace, or justice. 

Despite these provisions, national determination procedures have not yet been developed for the recognition of refugees (UNHCR 2014b, ERT 2010, p.144). In addition, Egyptian law does not provide protection for stateless persons, and Egypt is not a party to either of the statelessness conventions (ERT 2010, p.144). 

While asylum seekers and stateless persons have the right to legal representation, the lack of access to asylum procedures frequently leaves them subject to criminal and administrative detention based on charges of illegal entry and residence in Egypt (HRW 2010a, p.494; USCRI 2009). 

UNHCR’s Cairo office has the authority to make Refugee Status Determinations (RSDs) based on a 1954 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Egyptian authorities (UNHCR 2014b, USCRI 2009). In 2011, UNHCR began conducting RSD interviews at the border points of Sallum for persons entering Egypt from Libya and wishing to claim asylum (Undisclosed source 2011e). 

However, UNHCR representatives in Egypt are often denied access to detention facilities, refugees, and asylum-seekers (AI 2008a, p.4; HRW 2010a, p. 494), or have their access restricted to those refugees or asylum seekers already registered with the UNHCR prior to their arrest, or on a case by case basis (Undisclosed source 2011c). One observer claims that this may “prevent victims of trafficking and/or smuggling from coming forward to report their situations” (Hilal and Samy 2008, p.12). UNHCR Cairo has requested access to a number of persons in detention, including potentially stateless persons, without success (Pierrot 2013). In some cases, stateless individuals who were found to be non-deportable were simply released with a 6-month laissez-passer document (Undisclosed source 2011e). 

Rejected asylum applicants are provided with reasons for their rejection (Undisclosed source 2011a) and they must appeal the decision within one month. Rejected or late appeals result in cases being closed and a loss of UNHCR protection. Stateless persons often face indefinite detention because they cannot be deported (ERT 2010, p.145). Those definitely rejected by UNHCR remain in detention until they voluntarily repatriate or the Egyptian government forcibly deports them (Undisclosed source 2011e). 

According to UNHCR the detention of those moving irregularly, including asylum-seekers, has increased in recent years (UNHCR 2013b). This increase is reportedly adding to the workload of UNHCR staff conducting protection assessment interviews and putting a strain on financial resources for the provision of legal aid (UNHCR 2014b). The refugee agency reported in 2013: “After intensive multilateral efforts, more than 170 Syrian and Palestinian refugees were released in December from detention centres in Alexandria, Beheira and Port Said governorates” (UNHCR 2013c). 

In 2011, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child recommended that Egypt should not detain asylum-seeking children and should ensure unimpeded access to any detained asylum-seeking child by UNHCR (CRC 2011). 

Syrian refugees. Egypt initially applied an open-door policy regarding people fleeing the conflict in Syria. However, since the ouster of former President Morsi in 2013, the country has adopted increasingly stricter policies, including new entry requirements for Syrian nationals. 

According to government estimates approximately 250,000-300,000 Syrians resided in Egypt as of 25 July 2013 and 133,023 were registered with UNHCR as of end of January 2014 (UNHCR 2013a, 2014b). 

Approximately 1,500 refugees from Syria, including at least 400 Palestinian refugees and 250 children, were detained during the second half of 2013, according to Human Rights Watch. Up to 1,200 of these detainees were sent to Turkey, Lebanon, or Syria, where they could face arrest and torture. The government denied that Syrian refugees were forced to leave and stated that "No Syrian refugee is made to depart from Egypt unless they have been proven to have entered the country through illegal immigration, an action contrary to Egyptian law" (AFP 2013). As of November 2013, approximately 300 Syrian refugees remained detained in overcrowded police stations, 211 of them Palestinians (HRW 2013b, HRW 2014a, Dunne 2013). 

In one case, the public prosecutor dropped charges against several hundred detained refugees and ordered them released. The police, however, initially defied the order and continued to hold them in crowded police stations while pressuring them to leave the country (Chick 2013). 

The worsening conditions have led many Syrians to attempt to flee Egypt. According to one report, “More than 1,500 Syrian and Palestinian refugees from Syria have been arrested in Egypt [between August and December 2013] for trying to leave illegally by sea. The attempted exodus underscores how unwelcoming Egypt has become to Syrians since the military ousted former President Mohamed Morsi” (Chick 2013). 

European Union cooperation. An EU/Egypt Action Plan adopted in 2007 covers cooperation on political, security, economic, trade, investment, scientific, technological and cultural relations. Within the framework of the so-called EU Neighbourhood Policy, it includes a section entitled “border management” and purports to strengthen co-operation on migration-related issues, including the effective joint management of migration flows, legal and illegal migration and readmission. Under the section on human rights the Plan foresees EU assistance to implement relevant UN recommendations and the recommendations of the Egyptian National Council for Human Rights pertaining to security, detention conditions and prison staff and the protection of the human rights and integrity of detainees and the fight against impunity (Action Plan 2007, Ceccorulli 2011). 

In 2012 the EU reiterated its offer to negotiate with Egypt the establishment of a Mobility Partnership (similar agreements have been negotiated with other Mediterranean countries, including Morocco). However, Egyptian authorities rejected the offer. 

In 2007, Italy and Egypt concluded a readmission agreement under which Italy has sent back unauthorized migrants—including many Egyptians—without any asylum screening (Giuffré 2013).

Detention Infrastructure

Egypt does not operate facilities specifically for migrants. Rather, the country’s prisons, police stations, and military camps have been used to detain migrants and refugees apprehended at the borders or after entering the country (HRW 2014b, Undisclosed source 2011b). Numerous observers have documented detention cases at these facilities (HRW 2014b, HRW 2008, p.29; Grindell 2003, p.30-31; Malek 2008, p.31-46; IDC 2009; Migreurop 2013). 

According to the latest count by the Global Detention Project, at least 58 facilities have been used in recent years for immigration-related reasons (seeList of Detention Sites). Many of these facilities are police stations, including many stations in the Sinai Peninsula and the Nile Delta region, as well as two prisons in Cairo (HRW 2014b; Undisclosed source 2012).   

Among the facilities that reportedly have been used are: Tura Prison, Cairo;Qanater Prisons, Cairo; Aswan City Police Station; Nasr El Nuba police station; the Aswan Central Security Camp in Shalal; Ismailia Prison andIsmailia Police Station; Qena Police Station; Hadra Prison, Alexandria; Kom Ombo Police Station; Edfu Police Station; Hurghada Police Station; Marsa Alam Police Station; Daraw Police Station; Gourna Police Station in Gourna/Luxor; Ras Gharib Police Station on the beach of the Suez Gulf; theRomana Police Station; Bir El Abd Police Station; El – Khoseyma, Al-Nikhla  Police Station (El Nakhl) and Hassana Police Station; four police stations in Arish; Ataqa Police Station in Suez; Dahab Police Station;Nuweiba Police Station (Sinai); Rafah Police Station (Sinai); Ras Sidr Police Station (Sinai); Taba Police Station (Sinai); Tur Sina Police Station (El-Tor) (Sinai); Galaa Prison; and the El Mostaqbal Police Station (list developed based on numerous sources, including Undisclosed source 2014, 2012, 2011c ; HRW 2014b, 2009; Nowak 2010, p.108; Bustamante 2010; Malek 2008, p.31; AI 2009, p.6).

According to a source in Egypt, there are a number of additional police stations in the Nile Delta region that have been used recently for immigration-related reasons, in particular for detaining Syrians. This source provided the following list to the GDP, stating that each of these facilities had been visited by organisations that provide medical assistance to detained refugees and migrants. The names of these police stations are Karmouz Police Station,Montaza 2 Police Station, Bab Shark Police Station, Raml 1 Police Station,Borg El Arab Police Station, Amreya Police Station, Dekheila Police Station, Anfouchi Police Station, Matrouh Police Station, Edko Police Station, Rashid Police Station, Rahmaniya Police Station, Shabrakeet Police Station, Prembal Police Station, Biyala Police Station, Hemma Police Station, Zaafaran Police Station, Baltim/Borolos Police Station,Gamasa Police Station, Port Said Police Station, and Damietta Police Station (Undisclosed source 2014b).

In addition to these criminal facilities, as of late 2014, authorities in Alexandria had reportedly commandeered a youth centre, the Anfoushy Youth Centre, to accommodate people detained by the Egyptian military trying to leave Egypt in smuggling vessels heading to Europe. This facility, which the Global Detention Project categorizes as an Ad Hoc detention site, held approximately 130 people in early October 2014 who had been arrested on Egyptian shores in recent weeks. One journalist reported that the detainees were denied access to lawyers while held at the youth centre (Rollins 2014).

A 1986 decree (Decree 659) established that the following prisons be used for the temporary custody of foreigners awaiting deportation: Qanater El Khayereya Men’s prison, the Qanater El Khayereya Women’s prison, theAlexandria prison , the Port Said prison, and Tura prison. These are all important prisons in Egypt for incarcerating convicted criminals (Undisclosed source 2011b). 

In October 2013, Human Rights Watch visited Dakhliya Police Station andKarmooz Police Station in Alexandria. Each held between 50-75 refugees from Syria at the time (HRW 2013b). 

Conditions of detention.NGOs and International Organisations, including UNHCR, have little or no access to the facilities and no access to detainees, and little is known about the conditions of many of these facilities (Undisclosed source 2014). The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention have also been denied permission to visit Egypt. 

According to accounts provided by migrants and refugees who have spent time in detention in Egypt, anywhere between 20-35 people typically share cells in Egyptian prisons. The cells are generally between 16-30 square meters and provide access to a single toilet and washing/drinking facility. Detainees receive one meal a day. A blanket is provided to each prisoner—their only bedding—and each detainee sleeps on the floor. Treatment of detainees varies greatly depending on the particular prison. In police stations, detainees are generally not allowed to leave their cells and are locked up 24 hours a day. Cells in police stations can be as small as 3 or 4 square metres and are meant to hold a few people at a time for short periods. There is no budget for food or health care of larger groups of detainees held for weeks or months (HRW 2014b). 

In late 2013, a coalition of Egyptians NGOs documented the situation of several hundred Syrian refugees arrested and arbitrarily detained in Alexandria from August to October 2013. They were held in crowded detention facilities that lacked minimum health standards. Some facilities had insect infestations that led to skin diseases and respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses among detainees (EIPR et al. 2013). 

In May 2011, a seriously ill Eritrean male detainee died in El-Mostaqbal police station in Ismailia. He never received medical treatment and was not transferred to hospital. Another Eritrean reportedly died in the Taba police when he failed to receive treatment for tuberculosis (Undisclosed sources 2010b and 2011e). 

While segregation of males and females is generally respected in Egyptian prisons (HRW 2008, p.32), children are reportedly detained alongside adults (Nowak 2010). However, minors are generally held with their mothers and unaccompanied children are generally detained with women (Undisclosed source 2011a). Administrative detainees—including refugees, asylum seekers, and irregular migrants—are frequently detained alongside criminal detainees (Nowak 2010; Grindell, Richard 2003, p.30; HRW 2008, p.29). While foreign nationals are frequently held alongside Egyptian citizens in police stations, they are, where space permits, detained separately from Egyptian citizens in prisons (Undisclosed source 2010b; ERT 2010, p.146). 

A 2011 EU progress assessment of the EU/Egypt Action Plan listed as a “cause for concern” the paltry conditions at prisons and detention centres, as well as the lack of access to these facilities. The report also stated that “torture and ill treatment, mainly in police stations, State Security investigation centres and places of detention, remain a very serious human right abuse” (EC 2011). 

A 2013 European Commission report stated that “hundreds of African nationals (most of them Eritreans) are reportedly detained in police stations in Sinai in conditions that fall well below minimum detention standards required by human rights law” (EC 2013).

Facts & Figures

Egypt does not provide statistics or information about where people are detained for immigration-related reasons or how many people are detained. According to research undertaken by various human rights groups, some four dozen prisons, police jails, and military camps have been used for this purpose in recent years (see the GDP’s List of Detention Sites). 

One NGO study reports that during 2011-2012 the numbers of Eritreans and other sub-Saharan nationals detained in police stations and prisons “were probably in the high hundreds” in the Sinai region alone (HRW 2014b). 

Between 2007 and 2013, approximately 30,000 persons were trafficked in the Sinai, of whom up to 10,000 likely died as a result of having been trafficked (Reisen, Meron and Rijken 2013). 

Approximately 1,400 Eritreans were forcibly returned from Egypt to Eritrea in 2008, where they faced the risk of torture and other serious human rights violations (USCRI 2009), and approximately 180 were granted access to the UNHCR (UN News Service 2008), most of whom were granted refugee status (Undisclosed source 2011a). 

Sources in Egypt who work with detainees have reported to the Global Detention Project that irregular migrants are arrested at the Egypt-Israel border for irregular exit and infiltration; at the Libya-Egypt border for irregular entry; and at the Sudan-Egypt border for irregular entry and exit. Until the end of 2008, migrants and refugees arrested at the border were tried before a military court, sentenced to one-year imprisonment, and fined. 

As of mid-2013 there were 183,398 official refugees and 18,307 asylum seekers in Egypt (UNHCR 2014a). In contrast, during all of 2012, Egypt received approximately 6,600 new asylum claims according to UNHCR statistics. 

In addition, according to government estimates between 250,000 and 300,000 Syrians were residing in Egypt as of 25 July 2013 and 133,023 were registered with UNHCR as of January 2014 (UNHCR 2013a, 2014b). 

Before the Syrian crisis, most asylum seekers originated from African countries, including Sudan, Iraq, Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNHCR 2010). Syrian and Palestinians have become more numerous in recent years. One observer estimates that there are now approximately 70,000 Palestinians in Egypt, many of whom are stateless persons detained in Egyptian prisons and not registered with UNHCR, and thus not included in statistics. UNHCR reported only 74 non-Palestinian stateless persons living in Egypt in 2007 (ERT 2010, p.145). As of end of January 2014, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) reported an additional 6,000 Palestinian refugees from Syria (UNHCR 2014b). 

One journalist has estimated that there could be several million undocumented foreign nationals in Egypt. Wrote Berlin-based journalist Amir Heinitz in 2012: “The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) registered around 50,000 refugees and asylum seekers in 2010, and 95,000 in 2011. But taking into account non-registered migrants and asylum seekers brings the unofficial numbers in Egypt to anywhere from 500,000 to 4 million” (Heinitz 2012). 

The 4 million figure has also been cited by Egypt’s State Information Service (SIS Undated). 

References

  • AFP. 2013. “Egypt - no Syrian refugees forced to leave.” News24. 13 November 2013. www.news24.com/Africa/News/Egypt-no-Syrian-refugees-forced-to-leave-20131113-3 (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Africa and Middle East Refugee Assistance (AMERA). Website. “AMERA Egypt.” www.amera-uk.org/egypt/index_eg.html (accessed 3 February 2010).
  • Ahram Online (AO). 2012. “Egypt state of emergency ends for first time in 30 years.” Ahram Online. 31 May 2012.english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/43368/Egypt/Politics-/BREAKING-SCAF-lifts-Egypt-emergency-law-for-first-.aspx (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Ahram Online (AO). 2014. “Table: Official results of Egypt's 2014 constitutional referendum.” Ahram Online. 19 January 2014.english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/91957/Egypt/Politics-/Table-Official-results-of-Egypts--constitutional-r.aspx (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Al-Ali, Zaid. 2012. “The new Egyptian constitution: an initial assessment of its merits and flaws”. Open Democracy. 26 December 2012.www.opendemocracy.net/zaid-al-ali/new-egyptian-constitution-initial-assessment-of-its-merits-and-flaws (accessed 6 March 2013).
  • Aljazeera. 2014. “Comparing Egypt's 2012 and 2013 constitutions.” Aljazeera. 14 January 2014.www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/comparing-egypt-2012-2013-constitutions-20141144363151347.html (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Amir Jabir. 2010. In order not to forget the Sudanese Refugees in Egypt, lies and tricks, where are the UNHCR? Sudanese online website. © 2002-03 Sudan IT Inc. www.sudaneseonline.com/cgi-bin/sdb/2bb.cgi= (accessed 14 July 2010).
  • Amnesty International (AI). 2008a. Egypt. Deadly Journeys Through the Desert. Amnesty International MDE12/015/2008. August 2008.
  • Amnesty International (AI). 2008b. Egypt: Further information on forcible return/ fear of torture or other ill treatment: AI. MDE12/013/2008. 16 June 2008. www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE12/013/2008/en/76cbeb84-3c62-11dd-a518-c52d73496467/mde120132008eng.html (accessed 12 July 2010).
  • Amnesty International (AI). 2009. Eritrea: Sent Home to Detention and Torture. Amnesty International. AFR 64/002/2009. May 2009.api.ning.com/files
  • Amnesty International (AI). 2013. An International Failure: The Syrian Refugee Crisis. Amnesty International. ACT 34/001/2013.13 December 2013. www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ACT34/001/2013/en (accessed 29 September 2014).
  • Amnesty International (AI). 2013b. ‘We Cannot Live Here Any More’ Refugees From Syria in Egypt. Amnesty International. MDE 12/060/2013. 17 October 2013. www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE12/060/2013/en(accessed 30 September 2014).
  • Associated Press (AP). 2010. “Israel approves detention center for migrants.” Associated Press. 28 November 2010.
  • Badawy, Tarek. 2011. “Preliminary thoughts on Egypt’s Law Concerning Trafficking in Human Beings.” Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. CARIM Analytic and Synthetic Notes 2011/45. 2011.cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/17798 (accessed 6 February 2013).
  • Beaumont, Peter, and Patrick Kingsley. 2014. “Devil and the deep blue sea: how Mediterranean migrant disaster unfolded.” The Guardian. 1 October 2014.
  • Boston University Law Students et al. (BUSL). 2014. “Protecting Syrian Refugees: Laws, Policies, and Global Responsibility Sharing.” Boston University School of Law. 2014.belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/24131/podcast_and_report.html(accessed 29 September 2014).
  • Bustamante, J. 2010. "Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, Jorge A. Bustamante. Addendum. Communications sent to Governments and replies received." Human Rights Council. 22 May 2010.
  • Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS). 2010. Written statement submitted by the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status. Submitted to the Secretary-General and circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. Human Rights Council. A/HRC/13/NGO/66. 5 February 2010.
  • Ceccorulli, Michela. 2011. “Security framings and governance patterns: irregular migration in Mediterranean relations.” EU-GRASP. Working Papers N°25. December 2011. www.eugrasp.eu/security-framings-and-governance-patterns-irregular-migration-in-mediterranean-relations (accessed 6 February 2013).
  • Chick, Kristen. 2013. *Detained at sea, Syrian refugees stranded in Egyptian limbo.” Christian Science Monitor. 11 December 2013.http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/1211/Detained-at-sea-Syrian-refugees-stranded-in-Egyptian-limbo (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (CMW). 2006. “Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties  Under Article 73 of the Convention: Initial Report of States Parties Due in 2004 – Egypt.” CMW/C/EGY/1. 21 August 2006. tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/TreatyBodyExternal/Countries.aspx(accessed 30 September 2014).
  • Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). 2011. “Concluding observations: Egypt.” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. CRC/C/EGY/CO/3-4. July 2011.www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/crcs57.htm (accessed 12 March 2013).
  • Constitution of 2014.State Information Service.www.sis.gov.eg/En/Templates/Articles/tmpArticles.aspx (accessed 29 September 2014).
  • Constitution of Egypt. “Unofficial translation of Egypt's 2013 draft constitution,” prepared by International IDEA. December 2013.www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/egyptsource/english-translation-of-egypt-s-2013-draft-constitution (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Deutsche Welle (DW). 2011. “Egyptians abroad demand right to vote.” Deutsche Welle. 2 November 2011. www.dw.de/egyptians-abroad-demand-right-to-vote/a-15505333-1 (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Dunne, Michele. 2012. “Mubarak and the State of Emergency Sacrificed.” Atlantic Council. 2 June 2012.www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/egyptsource/mubarak-and-the-state-of-emergency-sacrificed (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Egypt State Information Service (SIS). Undated. “Egypt and the refugees’ issue. “Egypt State Information Service. Undated.www.sis.gov.eg/en/LastPage.aspx (accessed 7 March 2013).
  • Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR). 2010. “Following the Statement of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights: 14 Egyptian NGOs Demand a Halt of Migrant Killings on Israel Borders.” Press Release. EIPR. 9 March 2010.
  • Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR). 2013. “Joint press statement: Egyptian government must provide urgent health care to Syrian refugees detained in Egypt.” Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights. 25 November 2013. eipr.org/node/1883 (accessed 26 November 2014).
  • Emergency Law. 1958. Law no. 162.
  • Equal Rights Trust (ERT). 2010. Unravelling Anomaly, Detention, Discrimination and the Protection Needs of Stateless Persons. London. July 2010.www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/UNRAVELLING%20ANOMALY%20small%20file.pdf (accessed 2 August 2010).
  • European Commission (EC). 2011. “Joint Staff Working Paper - Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2010 Progress Country Report: Egypt. “ European Commission. High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. SEC (2011) 647. May 2011. www.enpi-info.eu/library/content/egypt-progress-report-implementation-enp-2010 (accessed 6 February 2013).
  • European Commission (EC). 2013. “Joint Staff Working Document - Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Egypt - Progress in 2012 and recommendations for action.” European Commission. High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. SWD (2013) 89 final. 20 March 2013. eur-lex.europa.eu/Result.do(accessed 11 February 2014).
  • EU-Egypt ENP Action Plan (Action Plan). 2007. EU Neighbourhood Library. 2007. www.enpi-info.eu/library/content/eu-egypt-enp-action-plan (accessed 6 February 2013).
  • European Parliament (EP). 2012. “Human trafficking in Sinai, in particular the case of Solomon W.” 15 March 2012.www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Fargues, Philippe and Christine Fandrich. 2012. “Migration after the Arab Spring. “Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Migration Policy Centre. MPC Research Report 2012/09www.migrationpolicycentre.eu/publications/ (accessed 5 February 2013).
  • Grindell, Richard. 2003. A Study Refugees’ Experiences of Detention in Egypt. American University. The Centre for Migration and
  • Refugee Studies. idcoalition.org/egypt-report-detention-conditions/(accessed 24 June 2010).
  • Giuffré, Mariagiulia. 2013. “Readmission Agreements and Refugee Rights: From a Critique to a Proposal.” Refugee Survey Quarterly. Volume 32, Issue 3. July 2013. rsq.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/3/79 (accessed 11 February 2013).
  • Hassouri Parastou. 2013. “30,000 trafficked in Sinai.” The Arabist. December 2013. arabist.net/blog/2013/12/6/30000-trafficked-in-sinai (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Heinitz, Amir. 2012. “Deport the African refugees to Egypt? Not so fast.” +972 Blog. 31 October 2012. Originally published in German in Zenithonline.972mag.com/deport-the-african-refugees-to-egypt-not-so-fast/58795/(accessed 7 March 2013)
  • Hilal, Leila and Dr. Samy, Shahira. 2008. Asylum and Migration in the Mashrek. Asylum and Migration Country Fact Sheet/EGYPT. Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network. Copenhagen. December 2008.
  • Hotline for Migrant Workers and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHR-IL). 2012. “Tortured in Sinai, Jailed in Israel - Detention of Torture and Slavery Survivors under the Anti Infiltration Law. “ Hotline for Migrant Workers and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel. 2012.www.phr.org.il/default.asp (accessed 5 February 2013).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2008. Sinai Perils, Risks to Migrants, Refugees, and Asylum Seekers in Egypt and Israel. 12 November 2008.www.hrw.org/en/reports/2008/11/12/sinai-perils (accessed 10 July 2010).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2009. Service for Life: State Repression and Indefinite Conscription in Eritrea. HRW. 16 April 2006.www.hrw.org/en/reports/2009/04/15/service-life-0.
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2010a. World Report 2010. Events of 2009. Human Rights Watch. United States of America.
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2010b. “UN: Egypt to Chair Refugee Agency’s Governing
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2012a. “World Report 2012: Egypt Events of 2011. “ Human Rights Watch. 2012. www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world-report-2012-egypt (accessed 6 March 2013).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2012b. “Egypt: New Constitution Mixed on Support of Rights Body.” Human Rights Watch. November 2012.www.hrw.org/news/2012/11/29/egypt-new-constitution-mixed-support-rights(accessed 5 March 2013).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2013. “Egypt: Emergency Powers Excessive: Detention Without Judicial Review; Trials Lacking Appeal Rights.” Human Rights Watch. 30 January 2013. www.hrw.org/news/2013/01/30/egypt-emergency-powers-excessive (accessed 7 March 2013).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2013b. “Egypt: Syria Refugees Detained, Coerced to Return.” Human Rights Watch. 11 November 2013.www.hrw.org/news/2013/11/10/egypt-syria-refugees-detained-coerced-return
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2014a. “World Report 2014.” Human Rights Watch. January 2014. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/egypt?page=3 (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2014b. ““I Wanted to Lie Down and Die” - Trafficking and Torture of Eritreans in Sudan and Egypt.” Human Rights Watch. February 2014. www.hrw.org/reports/2014/02/11/i-wanted-lie-down-and-die-0 (accessed 12 February 2014).
  • International Detention Coalition (IDC). 2009. Egypt: EFRR: One year old refugee child dies inside an Egyptian Prison. October 2009.idcoalition.org/egypt-efrr-one-year-old-refugee-child-dies-inside-an-egyptian-prison/ (accessed 27 July 2010).
  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2008. Labour Migration from Egypt. International Organization for Migration. April 2008.
  • Kingsley, Patrick. 2014. “Desperate Syrian refugees risk all in bid to reach Europe.” The Guardian. 18 September 2014. www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/sep/18/desperate-syrian-refugees-europe-mediterranean(accessed 26 September 2014).
  • Law of Entry and Residence of Aliens in the Territories of the United Arab Republic and their Departure Therefrom. 1960. Presidential Decree No. 89 (1960). Amended by Laws 49/1968; 124/1980; 100/19823; 99/1996; and 88/2005. www.egyptjudgeclub.org/jcma/tash/tash_mawad.php (accessed 6 March 2013)
  • Lynch, Sara. 2012. “Sinai Becomes Prison for African Migrants.” The New York Times. October 2012.www.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/world/middleeast/01iht-m01-sinai-migrants.html (accessed 1 February 2013).
  • Malek, Dalia. 2008. “Exposing the Protection Gap: Detention as Perpetuating Refoulement in Egypt.” American University. The Centre for Migration and Refugee Studies.
  • Migreurop. 2013. « Egypte Israël : L’enfermement des étrangers sur les rives orientales de la Méditerranée. « January 2013.www.migreurop.org/article2227.html (accessed 6 March 2013).
  • Ngozi Ezeilo, Joy. 2011. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children – Addendum - Mission to Egypt.” Human Rights Council. 15 April 2011.www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/MENARegion/Pages/EGIndex.aspx (accessed 5 February 2014).
  • Nowak, Manfred. 2010. Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak. United Nations Human Rights Council. A/HRC/13/39/Add.1. 25 February 2010.
  • Olwan, Mohamed. 2009. Iraqi Refugees in Neighbouring Countries: Anew Forced Protected Displacement in the Region. European University Institute.cadmus.eui.eu/dspace/bitstream/1814/11254/3/CARIM_RR_2009_13.pdf(accessed 22 July 2010).
  • Pierrot, Eirwen-Jane. 2013. “A responsibility to protect: UNHCR and statelessness in Egypt. UNHCR Research Paper No. 250.” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. January 2013.www.unhcr.org/510938469.html (accessed 4 February 2013).
  • Presidential Decree Security of the Eastern Border of Arab Republic of Egypt. 1995. President of Arab Republic of Egypt Decree No. 298, 1995.
  • Nivien Saleh. Website. (2012). “The 2012 Constitution of Egypt, Translated by Nivien Saleh, with Index. Saleh Nivien.” 2012.niviensaleh.info/constitution-egypt-2012-translation/ (accessed 5 March 2013).
  • Reuters .(2014). “Exclusive: Islamic State guides Egyptian militants, expanding its influence.” Reuters. 5 September 2014.www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/05/us-egypt-islamicstate-idUSKBN0H018F20140905 (accessed 29 September 2014).
  • Rollins, Tom. 2014. “Egyptian army shoot dead Syrian migrant, wound Palestinian – eyewitnesses.” Beacon Reader. 4 October 2014. https://www.beaconreader.com/tom-rollins/egyptian-army-shoot-dead-syrian-migrant-wound-palestinian-eyewitnesses.
  • Save Egypt Front (SEF website 2010). Amnesty International criticized Egypt for deportation of more than 1400 Eritrean asylum-seekers, UNHCR visit a detention center where the Eritreans are detained. 10 June 2008.www.saveegyptfront.org/news/print.php (accessed 10 July 2010).
  • Talani, L.S. 2009. From Egypt to Europe, Globalisation and Migration Across the Mediterranean. Tauris Academic Studies. I.B. Tauris.
  • Undisclosed source. 2010a. Email communication between representative of a non-governmental organization and Cecilia Cannon (Global Detention Project). 31 March 2010. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2010b. Information provided to Global Detention Project from a representative of a non-governmental organization. 3 October 2010. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2011a. Information provided to Global Detention Project from a representative of a non-governmental organization. 6 March 2011. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2011b. Email communication between representative of a non-governmental organization and Cecilia Cannon (Global Detention Project). 10 March 2011. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2011c. Information provided to Global Detention Project from a representative of a non-governmental organization. 21 March 2011. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2011d. Information provided to Global Detention Project from a representative of a nongovernmental organization. 12 April 2011. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source 2011e. "Global Detention Project Questionnaire". Global Detention Project. 2011. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Undisclosed source. 2012. Email communication between representative of a non-governmental organization and Michael Flynn. (Global Detention Project). December 2012. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2014a. Email communication between representative of a non-governmental organization and Michael Flynn. (Global Detention Project). 7 October 2014. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • Undisclosed source. 2014b. Email communication between representative of a non-governmental organization and Michael Flynn. (Global Detention Project). 12 October 2014. (Source asked to remain anonymous).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2009. 2008 Global Trends: refugees, Asylum-seekers, Returnees, Internally Displaced and Stateless Persons. UNHCR. 16 June 2009.www.unhcr.org/pages/49c364c4d6.html (accessed 29 July 2009).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2010. “Country Operations Profile – Egypt.” Website. Page copyrighted 2010.www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/page (accessed 2 June 2010).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2011. “2011 Country Operations Profile – Egypt.” UNHCR website. Page copyrighted 2011. www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/page (accessed 7 March 2011).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2014a. “2014 UNHCR country operations profile – Egypt.” UNHCR website. 2014.www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/page (accessed 6 March 2013).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2014b. « Inter-Agency Regional Response for Syrian Refugees - Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey 24 - 30 January 2014.” Reliefweb.reliefweb.int/report/lebanon/inter-agency-regional-response-syrian-refugees-egypt-iraq-jordan-lebanon-turkey-24-30 (accessed 11 February 2014).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2014c. “Syria Regional Refugee Response Inter-agency Information Sharing Portal.” UNHCR website. 28 September 2014.data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/regional.php (accessed 29 September 2014).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2013a. “Egypt: UNHCR concerned over detention of Syrian refugees amid anti-Syrian sentiment.” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Briefing Notes, 26 July 2013. www.unhcr.org/51f242c59.html (accessed 4 February 2013).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2013b. “UNHCR Global Appeal 2013 Update.” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2013. www.unhcr.org/50a9f826b.html (accessed 11 February 2014).
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2013c.”UNHCR Global Report 2013 - Egypt.” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2013. www.unhcr.org/539809f60.html (accessed 24 September 2014).
  • United Nations General Assembly. 2009. Protection of migrants. Report of the Secretary-General. 29 July 2009. A/64/188.www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,,,FIN,,4a9e2c1f0,0.html (accessed 24 June 2010).
  • United Nations (UN). 2008. “High Commissioner for Human Rights Urges Egypt to Halt Deportation of Eritrean Asylum Seekers.” UN Press Release. 19 June 2008.
  • United Nations (UN) News Service. 2008. “UN seeks increased access to asylum-seekers detained by Egypt.” United Nations News Service. 3 July 2008.
  • United Nations (UN) News Service. 2010a. “UN rights chief deplores Egypt’s use of ‘lethal force’ against migrants in Sinai.” United Nations News Centre. 2 March 2010.
  • UN Office for the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2010. “UN human rights chief deplores killing of some 60 migrants by Egyptian forces in Sinai since mid-2007.” UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Media Centre. Geneva. 2 March 2010.
  • US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI). 2009. World Refugee Survey 2009-Egypt. 17 June 2009. www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/refworld/rwmain (accessed 18 June 2010).
  • United States Department of State (USDS). 2008. 2007 Country reports on Human Rights Practices – Egypt. 11 March 2008.www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2007/100594.htm (accessed 27 July 2010).
  • United States Department of State (USDS). 2009. 2008 Country reports on Human Rights Practices – Egypt. 25 February 2009.www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/nea/119114.htm (accessed 27 July 2010).
  • United States Department of State (USDS). 2010. 2009 Country reports on Human Rights Practices – Egypt. 11 March 2010.
  • United States Department of State (USDS). 2012. “Trafficking in Persons Report 2012.” U.S. Department of State. 2012.www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2012/ (accessed 12 March 2013).
  • Van Reisen Mirjam, Estefanos, Meron and Rijken, Conny. (2012). “Human Trafficking in the Sinai: Refugees between Life and Death.” Wolf Legal Publishers. October 1012. asmarino.com/articles/1540-human-trafficking-in-the-sinai-refugees-between-life-and-death5 (accessed 5 March 2013).
  • Van Reisen Mirjam, Estefanos, Meron and Rijken, Conny. (2013). “The Human Trafficking Cycle: Sinai and Beyond.” Wolf Legal Publishers. December 2013. asmarino.com/books/1963-the-human-trafficking-cycle-sinai-and-beyond (accessed 4 February 2014).
  • Yasmine Ahmed and Rebecca Dibb. Pandemic Preparedness among Sudanese Migrants In Greater Cairo. American University. The Centre for Migration and Refugee Studies.www.egypt.iom.int/Doc/IOM%20Report%20Pandemic%20Preparedness%20among%20Sudanese%20Migrants%20final.pdf (accessed 24 June 2010).

Centres List

No detention centres data available

Statistics Expand all



3,051

Total number of immigration detainees by year

2014

  • Total number of immigration detainees by year
NumberObservation Date
3,0512014
1,5002013


57

Number of criminal facilities

2014

  • Number of criminal facilities
NumberObservation Date
572014


1

Number of ad hoc facilities

2014

  • Number of ad hoc facilities
NumberObservation Date
12014


106,000

Criminal prison population

2016

  • Criminal prison population
NumberObservation Date
106,0002016
66,0002011


1

Percentage of foreign prisoners

2002

  • Percentage of foreign prisoners
PercentageObservation Date
12002


116

Prison population rate (per 100,000 of national population)

2016

  • Prison population rate (per 100,000 of national population)
NumberObservation Date
1162016
802011



91,508,000

Population

2015

  • Population
NumberObservation Date
91,508,0002015
84,000,0002012


491,600

International migrants

2015

  • International migrants
NumberObservation Date
491,6002015
600,0002013


0.5

International migrants as a percentage of the population

2015

  • International migrants as a percentage of the population
PercentageObservation Date
0.52015
0.42013


500,000 - 4,000,000

Estimated number of undocumented migrants

2012

  • Estimated number of undocumented migrants
NumberObservation Date
500,000 - 4,000,0002012


213,500

Refugees

2016

  • Refugees
NumberObservation Date
213,5002016
212,5002015
230,0862014
180,0002013


2.64

Ratio of refugees per 1000 inhabitants

2014

  • Ratio of refugees per 1000 inhabitants
NumberObservation Date
2.642014
1.412012
1.22011


30,672

Total number of new asylum applications

2016

  • Total number of new asylum applications
NumberObservation Date
30,6722016
9,9962014
6,6672012
5,4992011


19

Stateless persons

2016

  • Stateless persons
NumberObservation Date
192016
212015
232014
602012

Domestic Law Expand all

Legal tradition Show sources
NameObservation Date
Muslim law
Civil law

Constitutional guarantees? Show sources
NameConstitution and ArticlesYear AdoptedLast Year Amended
YesConstitution of 2014. Articles 54, 55, 56 and 9620142014
Core pieces of national legislation Show sources
NameYear AdoptedLast Year Amended
Law of Entry and Residence of Aliens in the Territories of the United Arab Republic and their Departure Therefrom. 1960. (Law of Entry and Residence) Presidential Decree No. 89 (1960). Amended by Laws 49/1968; 124/1980; 100/19823; 99/1996; and 88/2005 19602005
Additional legislation Show sources
NameYear AdoptedLast Year Amended
Law 64 on Combating Trafficking in Persons, May 201020132013
Code of Criminal Procedure (Act No. 150 of 1950) as amended by law 95 of 200319502003
Regulations, standards, guidelines
NameYear Published
Presidential Decree of the Arab Republic of Egypt number 204 of 2010, defining the boundary areas of the border of the Arab Republic of Egypt2010
The Presidential Decree Security of the Eastern Border of Arab Republic of Egypt (1995)1995

Immigration-status-related grounds Show sources
NameObservation Date
Detention to prevent unauthorised entry at the border2013
Detention to establish/verify identity and nationality2013
Detention for unauthorised entry or stay2013
Detention to prevent absconding2013
Detention for failing to respect a voluntary removal order2013
Detention during the asylum process2013
Detention for unauthorized stay resulting from criminal conviction2013
Detention for unauthorised exit2013

Does the country provide specific criminal penalties for immigration-related violations? Show sources
FinesIncarcerationObservation Date
YesYes2013
Grounds for criminal immigration-related detention/incarceration and maximum potential duration of incarceration Show sources
Grounds for IncarcerationMaximum Number of Days of IncarcerationObservation Date
Unauthorized entry1802013
Unauthorized exit1802013

Maximum length for administrative immigration detention in law. Show sources
Number of DaysObservation Date
No Limit2016

Provision of basic procedural standards Show sources
NameIn LawIn PracticeObservation Date
Right to legal counselNo2016
Access to asylum proceduresNo2016
Right to appeal the lawfulness of detentionNo2016
Information to detaineesNoNo2013
Right to legal counselNo2013
Access to consular assistanceNoNo2013
Independent review of detentionNoNo2013
Complaints mechanism regarding detention conditionsNoNo2013
Access to asylum proceduresNo2011
Right to appeal the lawfulness of detentionYes2011

Is the detention of vulnerable persons provided in law? Are they detained in practice? Show sources
NameIn LawIn PracticeObservation Date
Unaccompanied minorsYes2013
Accompanied minorsYes2013
Asylum seekersYes2013
RefugeesYes2013
WomenYes2013
Stateless personsYes2013
Victims of traffickingYes2013

Mandatory detention Show sources
FilterNameObservation Date
NoNo2013

Re-entry ban Show sources
NameObservation Date
Yes2013

International Law Expand all

Ratio of relevant international treaties ratified
  13/19
Ratio of complaints procedures accepted Show sources
NumberObservation Date
0/8
0/8
Relevant recommendations issued by treaty bodies Show sources
NameRecommendation ExcerptRecommendation Year
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination26. Recalling its general recommendations No. 22 (1996) on article 5 and refugees and displaced persons and No. 30 (2004) on discrimination against non-citizens, the Committee recommends that the State party should: (a)Take the necessary measures to put an end to the detention of asylum seekers and refugees and speed up the implementation of the protection regime applicable to them; the State party should use detention solely for very particular specific cases and for the shortest possible period, and should allow UNHCR to visit the persons concerned with a view to identifying those who may be entitled to international protection; [...]2015
Committee on the Rights of the ChildEnsure that no asylum-seeking child is ever detained and to this end ensure the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees unimpeded access to any detained asylum-seeking child.2011
Committee on Migrant WorkersTake measures to investigate promptly all complaints of torture or ill-treatment of migrant workers while in detention, and prosecute and punish perpetrators.2007

Regional legal instruments Show sources
NameYear of Ratification (Treaty) / Transposed (Directive) / Adoption (Regulation)
Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (AU Refugee Convention)1980
ACHPR, African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights1984
ACRWC, African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child2001
Recommendations issued by regional human rights mechanisms Show sources
NameRecommendation ExcerptRecommendation YearObservation Date
Special Rapporteur on Refugees, Asylum Seekers, IDPs and Migrants in Africa (SRRASM)Urgent Appeal Request for Provisional Measures to refrain from expelling two Sudanese, Mr. Mohamed Adam Abdalla and Mr. Ishaq Fadl Dafallah, from Egypt to Sudan, who alleged that they were arrested on 4 August 2009 on suspicion of trying to cross the border to Israel where they were to suffer irreparable harm in violation of their fundamental rights under the African Charter. [SR obtained consent of the Egyptian authority not only to stop the deportation of the two Sudanese but also to release them]20102010

Bilateral/multilateral agreements linked to readmission Show sources
NameYear in ForceObservation Date
Greece20002000
Italy20002000

Visits by special procedures of the Human Rights Council Show sources
NameYear of VisitObservation Date
Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially in women and children2011
Relevant recommendations by UN Special Procedures Show sources
NameRecommendation ExcerptRecommendation YearObservation Date
Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially in women and childrenProvide comprehensive training programmes to increase knowledge and awareness of human trafficking among all stakeholders, particularly the police, immigration and border guards, and labour inspectors, with a view to equipping them with skills to accurately identify cases of trafficking.20112011
Relevant recommendations of the UN Universal Periodic Review Show sources
Recomendation IssuedYear IssuedObservation Date
No20142017
Yes2010

Institutions Expand all

Federal or centralized governing system
Federal or centralized governing systemObservation Date
Centralized system2013
Centralized or decentralized immigration authority Show sources
Centralized or decentralized immigration authorityObservation Date
Centralized immigration authority2013

Custodial authority Show sources
AgencyMinistryMinistry TypologyObservation Date
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2015
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceMinistry of Home AffairsInternal or Public Security2014
PoliceMinistry of Home AffairsInternal or Public Security2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInternal or Public Security2014
PoliceInterior MinistrwInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2014
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Prison DepartmentInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Prison DepartmentInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
SecurityDepartment of SuezInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Security Department of SuezInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2012
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2011
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2011
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2011
PoliceInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2011
Prison DepartmentInterior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2011
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2010
Interior MinistryInterior or Home Affairs2009
Apprehending authorities Show sources
NameAgencyMinistryObservation Date
The police2014
The army2014
Security DepartmentLaw enforcement, border control and national securityMinistry of Interior (Home Affairs)2013
Detention Facility Management Show sources
Entity NameEntity TypeObservation Date
Ministry of InteriorGovernmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Department)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Police (Interior Ministry/Security Management)Governmental2014
Ministry of InteriorGovernmental2013
Interior Ministry / Prisons SectorGovernmental2012
Interior Ministry, Security DepartmentGovernmental2012
Interior Ministry, Security DepartmentGovernmental2012
Interior Ministry, Security DepartmentGovernmental2012
Interior Ministry / Prisons SectorGovernmental2011
Interior Ministry, Security DepartmentGovernmental2011
Interior Ministry / Prisons SectorGovernmental2010
Interior Ministry / Prisons SectorGovernmental2009
Formally designated detention estate? Show sources
Formally designated immigration detention estate?Types of officially designated detention centresObservation Date
No2013
Types of detention facilities used in practice
Immigration detention centre (Administrative)Immigration field office (Administrative)Transit centre (Administrative)Reception centre (Administrative)Offshore detention centre (Administrative)Hospital (Administrative)Border guard (Administrative)Police station (Criminal)National penitentiary (Criminal)Local prison (Criminal)Juvenile detention centre (Criminal)Informal camp (Ad hoc)Immigration detention centre (Ad hoc)Surge facility (Ad hoc)Observation Date
2015
2015
2015

Socio Economic Data Expand all

Gross Domestic Product per capita (in USD) Show sources
Gross Domestic Product per capita (in USD)Observation Date
3,1982014
3,3142013
3,1872012
Remittances to the country Show sources
Remittances to the country (in millions USD)Observation Date
19,611,800,0002015
14,2132011
Remittances from the country Show sources
Remittances from the country (in millions USD)Observation Date
3052010
Unemployment Rate Show sources
Unemployment RateObservation Date
13.22014
9.42009
Net official development assistance (ODA) (in millions USD) Show sources
Net official development assistance (ODA) (in USD)Observation Date
3,532.22014
1,806,630,0002012
Human Development Index Ranking (UNDP) Show sources
Human Development Index Ranking (UNDP)UNDP four-tiered rankingObservation Date
108Medium2015
110Medium2014
112Medium2012

Pew Global Attitudes Poll on Immigration Show sources
% who agree with the statement “We should restrict and control entry of people into our country more than we do now.”Observation Date
722007
World Bank Rule of Law Index Show sources
Percentile rank among all countries (ranges from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest) rank)Estimate of governance (ranges from approximately -2.5 (weak) to 2.5 (strong) )Observation Date
40-1.12012
43-0.82011
51-1.12010

Country Links


Additional Resources


Submission to the UN Committee on Migrant Workers: Egypt

Global Detention Project Submission to the UN Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW) 26th Session (3-13 April 2017) Egypt Geneva, March 2017 Issues concerning immigration detention   The Global Detention Project (GDP) welcomes the opportunity to provide information relevant to the list of issues prior to reporting for the second periodic report of Egypt (due in […]

The Detention of Asylum Seekers in the Mediterranean Region

With the recent tragic surge in the number of deaths at sea of asylum seekers and other migrants attempting to reach Europe, enormous public attention is being focused on the treatment of these people across the Mediterranean. An important migration policy employed throughout the region is detention, including widespread deprivation of liberty of asylum seekers […]

Immigration Detention in Egypt

Back To Top