Lipa, Una-Sana Canton

Lipa Emergency Reception Centre

Status

In use

2025

Type: Detention centre (Ad Hoc)

Custodial Authority: Not Available

Management: Service for Foreigners Affairs (SFA) (Governmental)

Detains: Not Available

Deaths at facility Mistreatment complaints? Capacity
Yes

23 November 2025

Yes
No Data
Bosnia and Herzegovina

714

Migration Detainee Entries

495

Refugees

To country overview
ABOUT

Although it is not officially recognised as a detention centre, the EU-financed Lipa reception site is comprised of shipping containers, some of which function as de facto detention cells. Observers have compared the site to a "high-security prison," which operates with little or no official oversight in a remote location the inhibits access to services and detention monitors.


NEWS & TESTIMONY
2025

"On November 23rd, Mukter Hossain, a 41-year-old man from Bangladesh, died inside Lipa TRC after authorities refused to provide help during a clear medical emergency. His death cannot be understood merely as systemic neg [...]

Read More
FACILITY NAMES
Lipa Emergency Reception Centre
Location

Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina

City & Region: Lipa, Una-Sana Canton, Europe

Latitude, Longitude: 44.689392, 16.088485

MANAGEMENT & BUDGET

Center Status
Status
Year
In use
2025
In use
2021
Closed/ceased migrant detention
2020
In use
2020
Facility type
Category
Type
Year
Ad Hoc
Detention centre
2025
Administrative
Secure reception centre
2025
Administrative
Secure reception centre
2025
Ad Hoc
2020
Administrative
National typology
Official Typology
Year
Emergency Reception Centre
2020
Management
Management
Type
Year
Service for Foreigners Affairs (SFA)
Governmental
2026
International Organization for Migration
International or Regional Organization
2020
Outsourced services and non-state actors
Provider
Service
Year
International Organisation for Migration (IOM)
Management
2026
European Union (EU)
Not Available
2021
International Organization for Migration
Management
2020
Operating Period
Year of entry
Year ceased
2020
Foreign Support
Foreign Financing
Country/Entity
Offshore detention
Country/Entity
Year
Yes
Switzerland
2022
Yes
Austria (Development Agency and Ministry of Interior)
2022
Yes
Italy (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation)
2022
Yes
Council of Europe Development Bank (to the Ministry of Security/Service of Foreigners’ Affairs)
2022
Yes
European Union (EU)
2022

DETAINEES

SIZE & POPULATION

LENGTH OF DETENTION

OUTCOMES

CONDITIONS

Overall Inspection Score

Score Deficient (“Deficient” or “At Risk”)

2025

CARCERAL INDICATORS

Carceral Environment

Carceral Environment Partially

2025

Carceral Environment Partially

2023
Internal Security Regime

Security Level Mixed Regime (secure and open sections)

2023

STAFF

Mistreatment Reports

Mistreatment Complaints Yes

Details/Description Mukter Hossain lost his life in the camp due to the guards’ neglect of his condition.

Report date (Day) 23

Report date (Month) November

Report date (Year) 2025

2025

SEGREGATION

CELLS

COMMUNAL SPACE & ACTIVITIES

HEALTH

Reports of Deaths
Name of deceased individual
Date of death
Mukter Hossain
23 November 2025

MONITORING & ACCESS

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

NEWS & TESTIMONY

2025

"On November 23rd, Mukter Hossain, a 41-year-old man from Bangladesh, died inside Lipa TRC after authorities refused to provide help during a clear medical emergency. His death cannot be understood merely as systemic neglect, but a direct refusal to provide life-saving assistance. ... He told residents that he had been beaten, including a heavy blow to the right side of his ribs with the back of a gun. Upon arrival at the camp, he was in severe pain and vomiting. The camp’s medical unit examined him superficially, only providing painkillers and antiemetic medication; there was no follow-up, diagnostics, or monitoring. Over the following two days, his condition deteriorated rapidly. By November 21st, he could no longer eat or leave his bed. Residents repeatedly asked guards and camp staff to provide medical attention or call an ambulance. These requests were dismissed with excuses such as “There is no medical staff now” and “We will send someone tomorrow.” No care was provided."


2025

BORDER VIOLENCE MONITORING NEWOTK (May 2025): "The EU granted the Vienna-based International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) a mandate to build a detention unit at the Lipa TRC in Bihać, northwestern Bosnia, an initiative publicly announced in March 2022, after construction was already underway. The European Commission and Austria financed the construction of the main Lipa camp with €1.1 million, while EU accession funds covered the cost of the detention unit with €500,000.
In January 2023, the Global Detention Project reported that field observers had seen containers installed and separated from the rest of the Lipa camp. According to SOS Balkanroute, the detention area was surrounded by a high fence, equipped with surveillance cameras at every corner, barred windows, and cells with almost no natural light.
However, after months of pressure from SOS Balkanroute, other civil society groups, and journalists, the plan to operate the detention unit was halted. The turning point came when ICMPD failed to provide a valid building permit or documentation on the company awarded the construction contract, as reported in February 2023. Local authorities in Bihać and the Una Sana Canton also stated they were never informed about the detention unit and criticized the lack of transparency from the government. In a further attempt to defend its actions, ICMPD sued SOS Balkanroute’s founder Pero Rosandić, but lost the case in an Austrian court, which confirmed that ICMPD neither had a valid construction permit from local authorities nor a legal basis to detain migrants there.
After this, the city of Bihać issued a decision to demolish the detention unit. However, field reporters and people on the move say otherwise. The unit still exists: a cluster of container units enclosed by a high fence and separated from the rest of the Lipa camp. People on the move have shared that although the unit is not officially operational as a detention facility, it is often used for punishment and isolation when people are deemed to be causing “disturbances” in the camp. Thus, the Lipa TRC would indeed have an unofficial detention area, used much like isolation units in carceral systems. This area remains opaque and virtually inaccessible to independent observers, with little to no external oversight. Although Lipa is not officially designated as a closed camp, its remote and isolated location severely limits practical freedom of movement for those staying there. As a result, many people find themselves effectively trapped, with few options to leave or access services elsewhere."